Pacquiao vs SRR @ 145. Who wins?

Robinson beats him 9 times out of 10, but Pac could pull off an upset if they fought over and over again like LaMotta.

 

yeah, a prime morales had beaten a green, moving-up in weight with pillow as gloves pac. :good

 

green? i don't know...this was 2005. after the barrera and marquez matches. he wasn't green. he wasn't at his BEST but he wasn't far off. it's not fair to make his prime from his last loss on...he was pretty damn near peak at that point. missing the right hook and body attack for sure but hardly green. he lost fair and square to a boxer that was better than night

 

and morales was far more removed from his prime than pac

 

Ok whatever idiot said Robinson was a cruiserweight needs to cancel their membership to ESB immediately..Ray Robinson was the greatest weltwerweight hands down--**** he's the greatest fighter hands down...he has power in both hands, such unbelievable fluidity in his combos..to all the *******s, go youtube some of his videos from his golden glove days, his WW days as a pro, and than him at MW...SRR ko's pac within 4-5 rds tops....threads like these really make me wonder how much knowledge some people on here have in general.....

 

the welterweight robinson is possibly the greatest fighting machine in boxing history. the only downside is there is so little footage of those days. i'd kill someone for the gavilan or even armstrong fights

 

* Main Entry: sar·casm
* Pronunciation: \ˈsär-ˌka-zəm\
* Function: noun
* Etymology: French or Late Latin; French sarcasme, from Late Latin sarcasmos, from Greek sarkasmos, from sarkazein to tear flesh, bite the lips in rage, sneer, from sark-, sarx flesh; probably akin to Avestan thwarəs- to cut
* Date: 1550

1 : a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2 a : a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual b : the use or language of sarcasm

 

if uliuli says morales was shot, i say pac was green. besides the current version of pac so much better than the one who fought morales the first time.

 

no doubting this my man. what's amazed me about pac is how much he's improved in such a short time. it's only been four years and he's a completely different fighter. i think he was close, at least physically, to his prime but freddie did such wonders to him it's incredible. it's easy to look at the morales and marquez fights to pick out flaws but then you have to think how far he's come.

 

Whats next Pac vs SRL or Pac vs Hearns or Pac vs hagler or Pac vs trinidad. Or did I miss those threads. This Pac **** is funny. I am going to laugh like hell come Nov 14

 

Come on know, we are talking bout the best fighter to have ever lived, against pac. Srr by ko

 

well the dude is a fast and eager learner with professional work ethic. and you gave him a good teacher of the game in roach and you will have a good chemstry. what's his limit? we will see when he takes on cotto next.

 

He did not get that much better its just the comp got worse or should I say handpicked to make him look better.

 

the funny thing is it's the pac haters, aka floydettes, making this threads. They attract attention and next thing you know they are using this ridiculous threads to make there case.

 

i was right along that same line until hatton. was he supposed to beat hatton? yeah. was he supposed to beat the living **** out of hatton? no. hatton was still a DAMN good fighter and pac destroyed him like he was a joke. i really think pac finding out he has a right hand makes him one of the most complete fighters of the last two decades.