Manny's filled out so nicely, while retaining literally almost all of his speed. He was 148 pounds on the night he fought Hatton, without an ounce of fat on him...
I may favour Manny, he's faster, straighter puncher, better athlete and bigger puncher here. He can also work at Armstrongs pace too. Would be a hell of a fight
Disagree!!! While Manny has accomplished much,Lets not take away from Armstrongs remarkleble achievments!!!Counting up Hanks wins at all divisions And rating organzations, WBC>IBO,WBA HAnk would have owned 27 belts in 7divisions!!!!!! And this done by STAUNCH Ali backers who do all they can to disgrace any fighter REMOTELY challanging their GOD Muhammad Ali!!!!!
Manny doesn't possess the footwork, generalship, nor the jab to stop Henry's onslaught. Manny doesn't see the final bell in this match-up.
wrong area to bring this up ..they don't believe anyone born after 1972 could be competitive with old school fighters...