Pacquiao's 2nd KO loss (to Singsurat) Full fight

He was still taking losses up until 2005! He likely started using HGH from the Diaz fight on.

 

he went 6 years without loosing to anyone then in 2005 lost to morales... a mexican ATG

no shame in that.....plus he won the rematch and the re re match

 

I know you're just trolling, but you do understand the guy has gained a total of 2 pounds since that fight, right?

 

Ok thats fine and all but he still loss in 2005! He wasn't dominating in 2005 and was not considered p4p#1 or #2 correct? Floyd has been a top fighter since day 1 of his career.

 

There is a difference between real weight and weight after rehydration

 

What's your point? Read this comment from Cintron's ex- manager/trainer.



Quote:
Originally Posted by conditioner101

This content is protected

I don't know how bad it is. I know Kermit never took any. He was just a phenomenal athlete. I do know that for every guy out there working on the system there are 10 guys trying to beat it.
I have never drank, smoked, or used a drug of any kind in my life. i am st8 edge.
I think the possibility is there that paq has used something. Most likely ifg-1 or HGH. Both of which are very very hard to test for.
For training it would help you recover faster, and allow you to train at a higher intensity for a longer period of time. It also makes you more prone to injuries. muscle tears, and tendon injuries.
Some drugs are very fast acting and might help on fight night.

Thanks for answering my questions! :good

 

thats floyd not manny

all top fighters DONT follow the same career path

.... lewis got koed twice...

 

Answer my question. Was Pacquiao considered p4p# 1or # 2 in 2005 during that decade you speak of? When was the first time Pacquiao reached p4p#1?

 

So you're saying this is why Floyd Mayweather suffered a freak injury in training for Marquez that he refused to elaborate upon when asked?? I think I'm starting to understand.

 

Excuse #15

 

So i guess you chose to ignore the other 3 sentences in the quote! :-(


You lose all credibility right there by taking a quote and only using the part that you could counter with bs. Reply to the whole quote with a legit comeback would be nice.

 

in 2005 he was still considederd by many to be in the top 5

 

The question was pacquiao considered p4p#1 or #2 in 2005? The answer is NO.

Question? When was the first time Pacquiao was considered p4p#1?