Pacquiao's Imminent Return... and another damned catchweight.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jaguar, Apr 27, 2013.


  1. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    242
    Sep 28, 2007
  2. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,111
    Jul 24, 2004
    Obviously its Pacquiao's camp who will be setting any catchweight limits.

    The catchweight in this instance benefits Pacquiao since both Rios and Alvarado have been known to weigh more than Pacquiao on fightnight.

    The best avenue to beat Pacqiuao for either Rios or Avarado is through strenghth and power.
    They are not particularly more skilled than Pacquiao, and certainly they're not quicker or faster.

    Pacquiao needs to be light on his feet to have an easy time with either, and in case the fight turns into a rumbe and tumble type of fight, you dont want to have Pacquiao rumbling with a bigger and more powerful puncher, thus it makes sense if you're Pacquiao to set a catchweight to make certain either will drain to make weight and possibly not be as strong if they had'nt drained.

    Personally though, Pacquiao should'nt have much trouble with either of them catchweight or not. Its just Arum and Pacquiao's camp dotting their i's and crossing their t's!
     
  3. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,760
    3,974
    May 4, 2012
    :lol: Jesus christ Alvarado hardly beast Prescott yet this is a fight for him :lol:
     
  4. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,111
    Jul 24, 2004
    Whats your point?
     
  5. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    14,285
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    Prescott is a beast? no ****ing way!
     
  6. Jai C

    Jai C Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,746
    0
    Apr 13, 2009
    This is not news.
     
  7. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,760
    3,974
    May 4, 2012
    Watch more boxing on both counts please.
     
  8. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    14,285
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    answer the guy:twisted:
     
  9. Withwhatsmine

    Withwhatsmine Boxing Addict banned

    5,520
    1
    Jan 10, 2013
    Alvarado might be a cherry pick gone wrong.
     
  10. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,760
    3,974
    May 4, 2012
    Sorry, just makes me chuckle.
     
  11. papadoc28

    papadoc28 Boxing Addict banned

    4,623
    1
    Feb 17, 2010
    I swear the word catchweight and Pacaquiao are becoming synonymous with each other. I'd really wish he'd stand up and say no more catchweights. IMO Pac never needed a catchweight to beat Marg or Cotto. And IMO it just shows what little confidence those TR bitches have in Pac's ability to get the job done in the ring without doing something that will affect his opponents in some way or form. It's pathetic. I pity Pacquiao for not leaving when he could.
     
  12. Mexi-Box

    Mexi-Box Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,809
    8
    Apr 19, 2013
    Yeah, it will be a damn good night of boxing, though. I'd pay for that PPV, just like I would've payed for Rios vs. Alvarado I and II.
     
  13. fytelod

    fytelod Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,310
    1
    Nov 17, 2009
    so the catchweight will benefit who?
     
  14. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,690
    Sep 8, 2010
    In the end I think the catchweight is sort of pointless.

    It benefits Pac, as he's been at WW for 4 years while Alvarado and Rios have yet to fight there.

    If it didn't benefit Pac as some are saying, the fight would be at 140. And if it didn't benefit Alvarado or Rios, it would be at 147. Which is why in the end I think it is largely irrelevant.
     
  15. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008
    Rios or Alvarado attempting to drain Pac?