PACQUIAO'S Lawsuit PROVED That PACQUIAO is CLEAN...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by What If I Lose?, Sep 25, 2012.


Page 1 of 17
  1. What If I Lose?

    What If I Lose? Guest

    Correct me if I am wrong... but in order to PROVE that Floyd's statements were defamation, Pac had to prove that he was a clean athlete by submitting all of his medical records. Clearly, Floyd was on the brink of losing this case and was advised by his lawyers to settle out of court. And suspiciously, Team Mayweather decided to settle out of court after Team Pacquiao requested that Floyd's medical records be released in the countersuit...
     
    What If I Lose?, Sep 25, 2012
    What If I Lose?, Sep 25, 2012
    #1
  2. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    :lol: no


    This content is protected
     
    bballchump11, Sep 25, 2012
    bballchump11, Sep 25, 2012
    #2
  3. haworths623

    haworths623 Guest

    It's only *****'s who believe that anyway. The only reason Floyd said it was to duck Manny.
     
    haworths623, Sep 25, 2012
    haworths623, Sep 25, 2012
    #3
  4. bobotnaman

    bobotnaman ★★★★☆ Full Member

    3,884
    1
    Sep 8, 2011
    never failed a drug test.
    --


    Floyd:
    TAKE THE TEST
    TAKE THE TEST
    TAKE THE TEST
    TAKE THE TEST

    oops sorry he's not on steroids, we're sorry pacman.

    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
    bobotnaman, Sep 25, 2012
    bobotnaman, Sep 25, 2012
    #4
  5. Dio

    Dio Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,437
    2
    Jun 21, 2010
    Lol you have guys like Berto and Peterson pass all them tests and that means there clean? You think once they got caught it was there first time trying roids?
    The current drug testing is a joke.
     
    Dio, Sep 25, 2012
    Dio, Sep 25, 2012
    #5
  6. tito44

    tito44 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,585
    6
    Oct 25, 2009
    His head looks bigger to me. He is clearly dirty.

    So is Conan O'brien.
     
    tito44, Sep 25, 2012
    tito44, Sep 25, 2012
    #6
  7. randy brown

    randy brown $$$ Full Member

    1,866
    0
    Oct 28, 2011
    no, all they did was back floyd into a corner because of the stupid law.
     
    randy brown, Sep 25, 2012
    randy brown, Sep 25, 2012
    #7
  8. Jimmy The Geek

    Jimmy The Geek Active Member Full Member

    1,018
    1
    Apr 12, 2012
    When a person makes an accusation or an assertion, they are making a statement of fact. According to the ancient methods of Logic developed by the Greeks, the Scientific method and every western legal system, it is then up to the person who makes the statement of fact to prove that fact. Mayweather accused Manny of using PEDS and in doing so he made an assertion of fact. Thus, it was not for Manny to prove that he was "Clean", it was Mayweather's duty to prove that manny had been taking PEDS.

    Also, because this assertion was presented as fact and affected Manny's reputation, Manny had the right to sue for libel and provide a legal forum for Mayweather to prove his assertion that Manny was taking PEDS. However, Mayweather's mouth was more than his facts - and Mayweather could not prove that he was speaking the truth when he asserted Pacquiao was taking PEDS. As a result, Mayweather must pay for his lack of facts and the damage he has done to Manny's reputation.
     
    Jimmy The Geek, Sep 25, 2012
    Jimmy The Geek, Sep 25, 2012
    #8
  9. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    They also have to prove that Floyd said it with the intent of ruining Pac's reputation and Pac has to prove that the statements actually did hurt him
     
    bballchump11, Sep 25, 2012
    bballchump11, Sep 25, 2012
    #9
  10. Jimmy The Geek

    Jimmy The Geek Active Member Full Member

    1,018
    1
    Apr 12, 2012

    Yes...100% right! Thanks!
     
    Jimmy The Geek, Sep 25, 2012
    Jimmy The Geek, Sep 25, 2012
    #10
  11. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    44,810
    12,817
    Mar 5, 2006
    it didn't prove ****..

    defame..yes. prove that he was a cheat. no.
     
    DobyZhee, Sep 25, 2012
    DobyZhee, Sep 25, 2012
    #11
  12. prelude

    prelude Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,924
    7
    Nov 12, 2010
    We knew that *****s were dumb but we didn't think they were this dumb :lol::patsch.
     
    prelude, Sep 25, 2012
    prelude, Sep 25, 2012
    #12
  13. bahobilat

    bahobilat Guest

    that is why void had to settle under confidentiality. :rofl

    dumb void.
     
    bahobilat, Sep 25, 2012
    bahobilat, Sep 25, 2012
    #13
  14. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    Even if a statement is defamatory, there are circumstances in which such statements are permissible in law.
    Truth
    Privilege and malice

    **** read it for yourself
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation#Defences
     
    bballchump11, Sep 25, 2012
    bballchump11, Sep 25, 2012
    #14
  15. bahobilat

    bahobilat Guest

    another dumb ass hiding under the skirt of wiki. :rofl

    yeah, defense is good. it can get you scot free.

    but to settle under a confidentiality clause.

    much akin to plea bargaining under criminal cases. :hey
     
    bahobilat, Sep 25, 2012
    bahobilat, Sep 25, 2012
    #15
Page 1 of 17