PACQUIAO'S Lawsuit PROVED That PACQUIAO is CLEAN...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by What If I Lose?, Sep 25, 2012.


  1. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    D4 has not provided a source. The ***** is probably one of these other *******s just trolling.
     
  2. Don Draper

    Don Draper Member Full Member

    436
    0
    Jan 7, 2012
    With Berto and Peterson getting busted, it has become even more critical for PAC to take the Random tests.

    They both passed all regular tests and then failed the Random one. This shows you that the Random Test is way more scrupulous.
     
  3. KidDynamite

    KidDynamite Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,857
    1,511
    Sep 16, 2012
    peterson keeps a strap and the W despite cheating

    Whats to say that the same thing won't happen if Pac gets caught? we will know after the fight and he may get to keep the W if he "wins"
     
  4. technocrato

    technocrato Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,105
    300
    Dec 12, 2009
    It just prooves that Maeweather didn't have any proofs to back what he said about Pac being on PEDs.
     
  5. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    :deal

    Exactly..the commission testing is out of date and clearly not useful if the athlete does prepare for the test properly.
     
  6. Like Floyd, Bertoid an PEDerson suggested their opponent was using.

    But unlike Floyd they never controled the test and had USADA carry them out.

    VADA carried them out and it was the urine tests that caught them out, which Pacquiao agreed to from day one.
     
  7. Proof, the tool did not have any evidence at all, not even a smoking gun.

    Floyd knew it as well but those accusations gave him a reason to duck the fight with Pacquiao and that is all that Floyd wanted.
     
  8. Hey, dont cry because Floyd had to pay millions to Pacquiao.
     
  9. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    If there has ever been a frivolous lawsuit this was it. It did not prove or disprove anything. It was a stalling tactict by Pacquiao so he could avoid a Mayweather fight.
     
  10. The judges and the law would disagree.

    Floyd paid up and said sorry so Manny wouldn't leave him in the poor house.

    Now Floyd just needs to step up and grow a pair.
     
  11. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest

    Huh? Hey a-hole, before you declare a lawsuit "frivolous", know what frivolous means. If it was frivolous, Floyd didnt need lawyers to defend him, as the judge would just tell Pac to go eff himself and not waste the time of the court. But not only did Floyd hire the best lawyers money can buy, he lost. This means, legal ignoramus, that Pac's lawsuit was a strong as it got and airtight.

    Effin *****s now acting like lawyers when they don't know ****. :patsch