It was a close fight that could have gone either way. If Pacquiao got robbed, why did not the State Commission and WBO order the immediate rematch since they have already reviewed the tape? Sorry for the typo Pacquiao.
I had it 8-4 Pac, was definitely not a 11-1 shutout like the idiots at HBO were implying, but it was a steady, marginal win by Pac. The only people that think otherwise are too blinded by ethnic pride, just look at some of the posters that will say Bradley definitely beat Pac. There's a good example above me.
I had it 7-5 Pacquiao the second time I watched it without Jim Lampley sucking Pacquiao's dick and praising him every time the guy ****ing blinked. A lot of rounds were close and could have gone either way. Remember number of landed punches do not mean a won round. Pac was not doing **** the first 2 minutes of each round and tried to steal rounds. Fight could have easily went either way.
Pac beat Bradley more convincingly than Floyd beat Cotto. If Cotto got the decision, would that be a robbery? If you say yes, then Pac got robbed. Pac 9-3.
I think Bradley definitely won the fight. Mostly because the three rounds he won, I scored each a 10/7 round, but the nine I scored for Pacquiao were only 10/9 rounds. So, under the 10-point system, you've got to give it to Bradley. Pac definitely won the Marquez fight though. I thought Shane beat Pac, on the other hand. Because of the knockdown. His was a better KD than Pac's.
In your dream...name one significant punch that Pacquiao landed on Bradley? ....none. Bradley landed big shots after shots all night.