The nose dosnt have any bearing on the score of a fight. Ridiculous point to bring up. Bradley won more that one round. But seeing as you consider a bloodied nose as a factor in scoring a fight, I can see why you have trouble scoring it.
i'm asking for a "clear round" cotto won 2 clear rounds. bradley won one. and this is pro fighting, even if you have beaten someone 8-4 in the scorecards like floyd did to cotto but you got busted up, you have not beaten him that convincingly.
Honestly mate, I dont know who told you that, because its not true. I had Bradley winning 4 rounds. The rest of the close ones went Pacs way.
are those 4 rounds "clear rounds"? there was only one round that you can actually say that bradley won clear and that was the 10th. cotto at least won 2 clear rounds.
I agree only named punches count. A crunkercut wins the round straight away. I think more punches should be named. After cricket deliveries. "I hit him with a zooter he never saw, followed up with a googly and Yorker to the body, then stopped him with wrong-'un"
This article encapsulates how I feel about the fight http://www.eastsideboxing.com/weblog/news.php?p=32461&more=1
I believe Pac won the fight, but wasnt the worse robbery of the year.But because the conmotion of a big PPV fight and Pac's popularity things got blown out of proportion. Abril vs Rios was way worse.
Bradley won a points battle at best but no fight, and even that's a stretch because I still scored it for Pacquiao under the 10 point must. Bradley's win was so mediocre that 95% of boxing fans don't even care about a rematch, he can have his win and tell his grandchildren all about it some day.
really the punch stats, Olympic boxing must be way better than the Pros then. That punch stat **** really works doesn't it.