Pacquiso wasn't robbed!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Nopporn, Aug 17, 2012.


  1. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    Yes, those judges should log off too, clearly dont know what their doing. 70% of the media insiders should log off too, as the vast majority scored it 118-110, 117-111 to Pacquiao. Pls go.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,020
    48,131
    Mar 21, 2007
    Almost everyone sat ringside saw a robbery.

    You have to ask yourself why.

    There are something like four media cards out there that have Bradley winning or a draw. Everyone else has it for Pac.
     
  3. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    1,741
    Jan 4, 2007
    The question has still not been answered. If all WBO 5 judges scored it for Pacquiao after reviewing the tape as you said above, then what the hell is next?

    Don't tell me that they are going to do nothingelse.
     
  4. Cletis VanDamme

    Cletis VanDamme Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,429
    452
    Jun 5, 2012
    I'm sure lots of the Pacquiao haters who say it was no robbery said Marquez was robbed las time out when he fought Pacquiao. :rofl

    Suddenly, the beef is gone with Bob the crook, they don't have a problem with corruption, they had one with who benefited from it. But again, that can be said about many of Pacquiao fans as well :deal
     
  5. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,061
    35,182
    Jun 23, 2005
    :|:|:|
    Quit crying. It was a close fight and Pac wasn't robbed. A robbery is Rios-Abril not Pac-Bradley.:deal
     
  6. prelude

    prelude Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,924
    7
    Nov 12, 2010
    Nothing...because it would be a boring match again where Timmy would just get over power, fight, and run like a ***** again. Them judges don't want to see that **** again.
     
  7. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,061
    35,182
    Jun 23, 2005
    Actually Timmy would do better in the rematch. He's seen what pac can do and was figuring him out in the later rounds. I would pick Bradley to beat Pac in the rematch.:deal
     
  8. Filthy McNasty

    Filthy McNasty Punchy Old Pug Full Member

    1,902
    2
    Mar 1, 2010
    Very interesting.

    I also think Timmy will be much, much better if they rematch.

    Timmy's motivation (proving he deserved the first decision) and confidence ("he couldn't beat me with two peg legs") will be sky-high.
     
  9. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    14,285
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    Pacquiao want robbed. I got all the fights a draw.
     
  10. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Pac wasn't robbed.


    That was grand ****ing theft.
     
  11. How is that proof of anything ****** you picked out a clip from Youtube of Bradley landing LMAO go and do it again but see Pacquiaos Landed POWER PUNCHES. Of course you won't because you are a hater.
    So tell me how did Bradley hurt his foot??? IDIOT
     
  12. Atlanta you a bitter Yank?? Did you not do very well at the Olympics?? AHHH poor you..
    Compu box had no bearing on the result of a fight, they are just factual statistics that people like to see. However Judges in Pro and Amateur score by what they see as a scoring punch. The difference being there are more judges in Amateur boxing now and the scoring punch should be delivered with the correct part of the glove.
     
  13. Primera

    Primera Guest

    And black boys claim that pinoys are too into ethnic pride when it comes to boxing, lmao.
     
  14. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    Is the Pope Catholic? Yes, he was ****ing robbed. No way did Bradley win 7 rounds in that fight.
     
  15. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    How desperate can net trolls be.

    10-2 for Pacquiao and even those 2 rounds I gave to Bradley were close. :lol: