Pac's 8 titles in 8 divisions is like

if pac didn't skip 115 and 118, he could have actually been 10div champ.

 

Well doesn't matter in this thread, cause Pac was both Ring and lineal champ at 126 and 140.

Ok, it's very clear why you're running from my simple yes/no questions. I see you're not very bright, but a few posts back you must have realized the implications. Not that it gives me much pleasure to send a clueless, pathetic alt scurrying

 

Thread starter is just dumb.

The ring belt is not always the lineal title however it usually is.

IN Pacs case it always was.

Its like Wlad ditching his belts today, he is still heavyweight champ unless he loses ...THAT is a lineal title. He matters not whether he chooses to acknowledge the ring magazine belt you silly boy. For a lineal titl there is a clear LINE. When Pac fought Marquez the first time , Marquez had 2 paper belts, while pac was CHAMPION

 

he started Pro boxing at 105 or 106lbs,

his professional career has seen him go through or bypass 10 or 11 divisions, it is truly amazing and thats what annoys the floyd fans so dearly.

 

Me move forward? Lol this alt is a trip. Here I'll answer the questions for you, and even explain how it answers yours you sorry piece of ****

1. Sergio was lineal vs Chavez without an ABC belt
2. If a lineal champ is stripped of his ABC belt, the lineal belt does not go vacant

Lineal belts are determined by lineage, ******. That's why they are called "lineal", who woulda thunk it. Pac beat lineal champs at 126 and 140, hence he was lineal in these division.

 

He's been told a dozen times in this thread. The poor idiot still refuses to get it

 

Winning the ring magazine title counts if the guy you beat is the lineal champ. The person makes the title not the other way round. For example if Andre Ward declared tomorrow that he doesn't want the Ring 168 title or any of his other alphabet trinkets he is still the man at 168 and anyone else in the division with a belt is still behind him.

As for non major sanctioning body titles counting they obviously don't but its not really relevant as I don't think Pacquiao(who in reality can maybe claim to be at most a six division champion) has ever held anything like a WBU title.

 

In moronic alt ratings. Can you send me a link to these from Aug 2012? I wanna see where Sergio was ranked at MW

Why would anyone wanna learn from a pathetic, ******ed alt who does not understand lineal belts, or moving up in weight?

 

Thread is ******ed. If all of these guys in the smaller division can easily go up in weight and pick up an easy title... Why don't they do it? I'm sure you could say some fighters want to clean out their respective division, but every elite fighter chooses to do that? With a guy like Mayweather, who thrives on ego, doesn't win 8 divisions (just to say hes better than Pac without proving it in the ring) then I doubt many guys can.
Also, it wasn't like Pac fought cans at each weight class. Guy @ 135 wasn't a great fighter (can't remember his name right now), but outside of that he took on decent-good-elite opposition for a strap. Also an ATG resume, where he didn't duck and cherry pick (anybody who fights a guy like Marquez who they struggled with over and over again proves it), shows he's an ATG.

 

He can claim 7, his SWW belt was bogus. But so was DLH's 6th, and Floyd's 5th is also sullied. At 126 and 140 Pac beat lineal champs

 

How was his JMW belt bogus?

 

Diaz at 135 was a bit of a weak champion to beat. No different than Broner beating Malignaggi at 147 to become a 3 division champ.

 

Well it was a vacant belt at a CW vs not top 10 Marg. Maybe a little better than Mares' 122 belt, not much. But don't get me wrong, Marg was a very good win for Pac. still the belt is bogus