Apparently this guy doesn't, Petrocelli, a Los Angeles-based attorney, is best known for winning a 1997 wrongful-death civil judgment against O.J. Simpson. but you do?
You know he will most likely be charging by the hour, so he could give a **** what happens as long as he is gouging Pac.
:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl And according to some fools, it takes years. How long was the OJ civil suit? It was over quicker then his criminal suit.
Let's not talk about the fact that you know jack about the law... And instead divert attention to how much he's charging which you don't know either.
I was surprised at all the crap that had been said about Pac after reading the details of the suit. No wonder Pac is so angry.
he gets paid based on reputation and past results. losing this case would cost him a lot more in loss of future clients. or do you think he is just looking for one last big payoff before he retires?
Big name lawyers have lots of money. They actualy stand to lose more for taking a high profile case and losing. This case will be showcased world wide. More then just money is at stake with the firm taking this on.
IMHO there is a big difference between being able to read and think, and having a qualified opinion. I don't have any legal qualification. But I have spent the last 2 years working with and interpreting legislation. It's not something that you want to comment on if you have nothing but "I can read and I can think" no matter how good you believe you are at both. Even though I now have some experience with reading and interpreting law, there is no way I would try to say if Pac's case could be successful or not.