cotto vs pac has no meaning. fights that ended up as a one-sided beating shouldn't be given a rematch. I wonder where floyd is hiding now, he's the root of all this arguments lol
Think about this seriously. PAC vs Cotto rematch at 152 lbs.. eze said that Cotto's Jr. Middleweight title should not be on the line so it's a non-title fight. Let's say PAC again annihilated Cotto for the 2nd time, brutally knocking him out. eze would you still recognize Cotto as the Jr. Middleweight champ if that happens? If yes, it will be hilarious. It's better for Cotto to put the title on the line and hope the best man wins since I think even Cotto can't accept being called a champ if he loses to PAC badly.
Cotto did complain to put the title on the line but I think he realized that what's the purpose of that title if he loses badly (as what really happened). Heck better put the title at stake and may the best man wins.
Pac already knocked him out, theres no point of a second fight specially if 145 was the only weight Pac would fight him at but now 154 is fine? If not 152?
Naah he has GBP to alternately **** him too. Remember Cotto played golf with Hoya in PR. Cotto and GBP also co-promoted fights in PR. Cotto just realized it will be a big joke calling him a champ if he losses to the smaller Pacquiao.
A lot of dudes rematch people who starch them. Look at Lennox Lewis. Pac rematched Barrera and Morales a 3rd time. Holyfield beat up and stopped tyson, they rematched. Cotto gets written off way too much for his losses.
Normally boxers grow and becomes heavier in weight. You can't fault them to weigh heavier today than yesterday.