to be honest i can see the thread starters point, i do think most of the danger from pacs punches come from his speed and angles, not as much from the actual power behind that shot (as opposed to say, a trinidad or foreman punch, who has that 'it' behind it) that being said.... anyone being logical can see Pac has got power.... hell you could watch him just hitting the mitts with Freddy and tell that there is power behind his shots. Pac has got major league power.... i dont see how anyone can deny that. But at the same time, i dont think its as much just plain power as much as i think its speed, timing and angles..... but so what?
Well i agree with everyone here that Pac is a good puncher i stated earlier that he has Good power + Great Speed=Knockouts. Although the reason I quoted you was that Delahoya said that he dont think Pac hit hard that it was his speed. I believe that was Oscars honest opinion but I think that has more to do with that was Pacs first fight at Welter and Oscars great chin. Id bet that Pac is hitting harder know that he is settling into his higher weight more comfortably.
I was going to denie Pac's power when I saw your avatar, but reading why you have it, thats alright. :good Joke aside, I totally agree with your comment. He doesn't have Trinidad/Foreman type power, but power is definetly their.
Kirk, I don't really understand the OP's stance. Pac brutally knocked out David Diaz, 3K Battery and Ricky F'n Hatton. Pac's going to win KO of the year and its quite possibly KO of the decade. Hatton was out cold for a good 10 minutes and this newb wants to state that he doesn't have true knockout power? F'n ridiculous.
wattup Doby :good Ya i dont quite understand that aspect.... hes on his own there, but what im saying, just personally (and i can understand those who dont agree) is although Pac has very good power, i think a lot of what looks to be concussive power is a potent mix of angles, timing and speed. For example.... i think Mosley, punch for punch, just might hit harder then Pac, but.... i dont think Mosley could get a lot of the knockdowns that Pac gets because he doesnt strike at with the combined mix of angles, good timing, and with quite as much speed as Pac.... But the reason I say 'so what' at the end of my post is..... so what? lol.... So pac gets his knock downs from a lethal mix of speed, angles, timing and power..... and this is held against him? the thread starter is saying that pacs power isnt as great as its made out to be because a lot of the people he knocks down get back up.... lol. Sorry, but if timing and speed were all you needed to knock someone down, Mayweather would be knocking fools down all over the place, you still have to have that 'it' factor behind your punch to do the things Pac does.... anyone who cant accept that has some sort of agenda IMO. And trying to cite lack of power through knockdowns is a bit of a losing battle lol. But, the thing i can see what hes saying is just that i personally feel a lot of the danger in pacs punches come from timing, accumiliation, and speed.... not so much that 'classic power' (like jackson, foreman, chiquita gonzalez, ect, ect) but again.... so what? So pac has speed, accumilation, angles and timing, that he has developed in order to help his power.... doesnt mean he also doesnt have very real power. The other thing hes saying is that most of Pacs knockdowns, they get back up. Meaning that hes usually not knocking people out cold.... In fact i think thats his co main argument, is that pac doesnt have as good of power as everyone thinks because besides a fight here or there, hes generally not knocking people out cold. I can see what hes saying but i dont know... how many big punchers below 154lbs continuassly put good competition OUT? And is THAT ones criteria for being a great puncher? again, i sense an agenda here obviously.... because pac is a very good, very, very good puncher. wether it comes from just that classic, natural power or a mix of angles, timing and speed.... it doesnt really matter when your opponents continue finding themselves on the canvas. As for him not knocking a lot of his opponents OUT... not many people are going to spark jmm, cotto, hoya, morales, or mab. Since Pac has reached his peak he has been fighting almost complete elite or top tier fighters, so its natural that he doesnt have a lot of 'out cold' scenarios.... also, as hes gotten better and a harder puncher, hes also facing bigger opponents who are more likely to absorb his one hitter quitter punches.... so theres a lot of factors here. that being said, i cant believe i just typed so damn much on a subject questioning pacs power lol. atsch Pac has power, period....
A myth? your showing lack of knowledge already just by the title alone. Step it up how can *******s take any of you posers serisously.
Pac has very gud power in both hands. He has KOd his last four opponents and KTFO hatton with one huge shot.
What the hell does Pac have to do to not be considered overrated by some? Move up to HW and defeat both Klitchkos in a 2 on 1 match by KO? Then go back in time and defeat Sugar Ray Robinson?
I know you don't know **** about BOXING at all.Your just another poser.BTW you can't hear comment on here. :blood
I am a huge PBF fan but not a pac hater....to write he is overrated in any way is just plain hating and stupid...the guy is a monster....PBF will beat him IMO but he is a force....ask hatton how his power is...he put him to ****ing sleep...ask cotto who is 165 in the ring....the guy can punch
Very common misconception that PAC didn't win any other rounds after the 1st or 2nd. But their is proof and all one has to do is watch the fights again. I have them and I've watched them numerous times. JMM did a masterful job after his terrible 1st round but he did NOT win all the remaining rounds.....not by a long shot. It's easy to say that PAC faced guys who were tailor made for his style. But Cotto can box...he impressed me very much with how he faught Shane....although I felt Shane won....it was in no way a robbery and Cotto boxed a very skilled and gifted Boxer in Mosely to the point where Shane was confused. Cotto tried and couldn't do that with PAC. No question Floyd is the best BOXER around these days but Floyd is not the best FIGHTER! PAC is.....and that is not up for debate just like Floyd being the best boxer is not up for debate. Floyd hasn't seen or faced anything like PAC and PAC hasn't seen or faced anything like Floyd. The talent, ability and natrual gifts that both these men enjoy over MOST of their opponents will be at a stalemate aginst one anther. The outcome of the fight wil depend on who has the best gameplan and who has the most "WILL" to win. If one man has BOTH the will to win and game plan it will be onesided.....if they spilt the two between Floyd and PAC it will be one of the more exciting fights we've ever seen Floyd in.