Pac's will have an uphill battle winning this lawsuit of his...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by NeckBreaknAiken, Dec 30, 2009.


  1. Fighting Pride

    Fighting Pride Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,538
    1
    Feb 12, 2009

    Oscar using the Ring as a vehicle for GBP propoganda is an absolute disgrace. He deserves death by firing squad for that. The Ring has been reduced to a Golden Boy tool. Soon they'll be selling his line of fishnet bodysuits and high heels.

    Anyway, if they do have any proof Richard Schaefer told a bunch of journalists Pac is a drug cheat GBP could be in a bit of trouble there.
     
  2. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Looks like a very winnable suit for Pac.
     
  3. lyraus

    lyraus Member Full Member

    442
    0
    Jul 20, 2004
    I agree that DLH was a moron for using his Ring Mag blog as a vehicle to cast aspersions against Pacquiao. I don't know if it would qualify as liable though.
     
  4. Powerman55

    Powerman55 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,295
    0
    Nov 26, 2008
    You haven't been reading all the posts. You need to download the court document (it's readily available online) and it's plain to see they all accussed him directly.
     
  5. ricardinho

    ricardinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,241
    3
    May 17, 2009
    Fourth he has to have suffered damages

    fifth proove that the statements caused those damages...real tough
     
  6. boxsensei

    boxsensei Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,708
    82
    Oct 19, 2008
    Not only that, but Pac being a public figure has to prove that the statements were made with actual malice. Its very hard to win a defmation suit as a public figure.
     
  7. boxsensei

    boxsensei Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,708
    82
    Oct 19, 2008
    There is no prosecution in a civil suit for defamation. You have a plaintiff and a defendant. Prosecutions are criminal cases.
     
  8. SugarShane_24

    SugarShane_24 ESB good-looking member Full Member

    8,929
    39
    Jul 21, 2004
    Just one question, do any of you guys believe that Pac is clean have not used any performance enhancing drugs all his life?
     
  9. sinner78

    sinner78 Active Member Full Member

    1,294
    0
    Dec 7, 2007
    Pacman is now officially a joke. Flat out refuses to take a test and then sues mayweather for accusing him of doing P.E.D's . Surely a test would kill any rumours stone dead!!
    I suppose he is also going to sue Cintron ,malignaggi ,Mosley and the other people who thinks he is suspect.
     
  10. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    Wrong term used, but the concept is there. Can't concentrate in what I am writing at the same time looking after the barbeque.

    Defamation cases are not very hard to win. Many personalities win against big magazine companies considering that those companies are well backed by very large law firms.

    There is a reason why Hoya's statement was taken off the net.
     
  11. Chileno606

    Chileno606 Gentleman & Scholar Full Member

    1,587
    1
    Mar 25, 2007
    Pacquiao has no case. Anyone with a basic knowledge of law can see this. Aiken broke it own well. The Mayweathers have contunually said that "hey its my opinion"...
     
  12. hooligan

    hooligan Millionaire Bum Full Member

    4,499
    10
    May 8, 2006
    what about lil floyd saying that the philippines produces the best steroid available? (during a debate with rugged man on radio)
     
  13. Atlanta

    Atlanta Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,688
    6
    Dec 26, 2009
    This lawsuit isn't really strong, it is by no means a slam dunk or anything close.

    Pacquiao's case centers around Schafer's comments, De La Hoya's Blog, Mayweather Sr.'s Comments, and Mayweather Jr.'s comments.

    Mayweather Sr.'s comments are the easiest out of the bunch to try because he did say he thinks that Pacquiao is on HGH because of his explosiveness. But the argument is that were these his genuine opinion.

    Schafer's comments are going to be the second easiest, but the snag with them is that they were made allegedly to one person, a Philippine reporter, months ago in private. What took the reporter so long to go to Manny with the comments? Why would Schafer make the comments when he had no stake in the upcoming fight other than Manny?

    De La Hoya's blog post that I think they are targeting is the one where he questioned why Manny isn't taking the blood test for $40M. There isn't a case there because everyone is wondering that.

    Mayweather Jr.'s alleged comments saying that the "Philippines are where the best PEDs come from" are hardly chargable if Mayweather is able to prove that a high number of PEDs do come from there. If it is, then it might be an wink and nudge but it isn't anything more.

    And finally, the judge would have to determine how much these comments hurt Pacquiao's reputation. It isn't easy because he is a boxer and his entire job is based off of contract negotiation so he would have to prove that boxers XYZ won't get into the ring with him because of these allegations, not his refusal to take random blood tests.

    Also the judge will take into account Pacquiao's and Arum's backpedaling on the issue, they agreed to testing anywhere-anytime, then it became no blood testing six weeks before the fight, to no blood testing at all, back to a fixed schedule blood testing. That is what most people that aren't *******s see as the main problem in all of this, Team Pacquiao changed their stance multiple times on the issue and came up with different Phobias for Pacquiao, and that is what caused the damage to Pacquiao's image.
     
  14. pablogad

    pablogad Member Full Member

    474
    0
    Oct 1, 2005
    thanks for providing critique of the main areas of Pac's lawsuit
     
  15. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    we have experts from every field here on ESB