Contradicting yourself again. Just a day or two ago you said that you had bragging rights for being near the top of the Big Fights League standings. You picked no upsets last week, but claimed bragging rights anyways for picking favorites. You also claim bragging rights for Pacquiao wins where he is favored. You don't gain bragging rights soley by picking upsets. If you are to gain them, it would be by correctly analyzing fights. I don't believe in that crap anyways, but it's interesting that you feel the need to limit how you gain "bragging rights" to a criteria that will allow you a built in excuse if you're wrong. By what you just said, a person could pick 8/10 fights correctly, but if only one of those 8 correct predictions was an upset, he would be a lesser analyst than you if you only got 3/10 right, but 2 of them were upsets. Sorry, that makes no sense. Oh, and you're guessing on the Klitscho fight. You are using Youtube footage of him getting KO'd (4 years old or older) as your analytical tool.
I want to the underdog to win but WLAD is just too big and too strong for Sultan. I just don't see how Sultan can pull this off!?!
Difference between you and me is I don't care if I am better than you. I know this. When I pose questions to you, you most often cannot answer. You simply post about how great you are or you change the subject entirely. If you are wrong tomorrow, you won't gain leniency from your built in excuse. If you can brag about being right, you can take your lumps for being wrong like the rest of us. PS. Care to comment on your contradictions?
Here's an underdog pick for you: Marquez UD Pacquiao Putting down kg and continuing to talk about your "bragging rights" is silly. He knows 10x more about boxing and analyzing matchups than you will ever know. So keep thinking Pac will go on to beat Floyd and when Pac loses again (which will be very soon), I hope you don't make excuses and you apologize to everyone on this board for being the most annoying, extreme nuthugger of all time.