This. The ones claiming wilder deserves 50-50, will turn around and say ,aj is the a side lmfao, the b side dont make the offers. This b side also don't get 50-50
If he's fighting a champion, the champion brings something to the table. And Joshua isn't taking a pay cut. He's making more. That's what you Joshua fans don't get. Hearn doesn't either. And this isn't the first time that Hearn has done this.
AJ isn't the one that has a problem making big fights. You need to calm down and look closer to home, angry kid.
Do you need examples of purses where the champion is paid vastly less than the champion: Frank Bruno (Champ) $6 mil vs Mike Tyson $30 mil Mayweather $41.5 mil v Alverez (Champ) $5 mil Mayweather (champ) $32 mil v Maidana (Champ) $5 mil Seldon (champ) $5 mil v Tyson $15 mil. Shall we go on?
Honestly, there's no point giving him examples. He would only be happy if AJ was the one making $2m a fight.
Youre comparing the biggest draws in boxing to Joshua Wilder? Lmao. And you're using Seldon, Maidana, and Bruno as examples, lmao. That's why they negotiate fights.
Well yes because the biggest draw in boxing right now is Anthony Joshua. Parker and Wilder however couldn't fill a phone box.
Lol, add me to the list aswell lmfao, gtfoh, rofl, lol. I've never known a poster on here chat so much complete and utter bollox, lol, lmfao, rofl.
Im sick on this percentage side of boxing. Its a joke. The rule should be simple. It takes 2 people to put on a fight. They should get an equal share. yes some fighters are more popular than others but in the long run they will make more because they will get an equal share of a big number for each fight, but for their poor opponent this may be the only opportunity to fight a big name so its fair they should also make money.