they have all fought in the last few weeks so who do you think has come out best?heres what I think. Wilder fought a guy that is well past his best but the intent was there and you could see in deontays eyes he meant business. Parker against fury didn't really show us anything to suggest that he will be a major player.i think he needs an offensive fighter to bring out a war in him. I was disappointed in Joshua because when the bombs don't work he runs out of ideas and gas .i think Joshua is greatly overated and been put on a pedestal by Eddie Hearn.lasts nights wilder would beat both Parker and Joshua. As for Tyson fury maybe he could beat them all but I don't think it will ever get off the ground with him.
Joshua will annihilate Wilder if they ever fight. Unfortunately, with Wilder's track record, that's a big IF.
Of the 3 i was just about most impressed with Wilder but of the 3 Wilder had by far the worst opponant. Joshua never looked comfortable against Takkam and with his nose injury but was walking it on the cards, had Takkam looking pretty beaten up and down on the floor. If you look close it was a decent performance by Joshua but cuz we all expect a big stoppage it felt a bit flat. Parker, who i feel is the weakest of the 3 champs had it tough against an opponant, like Takkam, who is really going to make it hard for anybody to look good against. But on foreign soil he got the job done. Fair play to him. Wilder, well Wilder looked devastating for just under the 3 minutes we were treated to but how much can 3 minutes against a fat fukkin punch bag impress anybody? Nothing against Wilder, Stiverne is to blame for this. But Wilder did the very most he could in his 3 minutes so fair play for that and it is a good KO for the youtube compilations.
^^ All we need to know about Wilder... He's a joke and paper champ who will get found out soon enough.
Was meant to be an meme of Wilders opponents rankings when he fought them... Still comes up as that for me. Basically... Top 10 - 1 Top 30-40 - 3 Top 40-60 - 31
