lol You don't believe me and you don't believe Pascal. Can't say I'm surprised. You have every right to believe what you want, just like I have.
I'd say it stands to reason, that a physically bigger man would punch harder, but heres a question for the doubters and naysayers..... Why did he put Frochs name in the number one spot, and not Bute, Dawson, etc ?
Now we only have to wait for a statement by Kova in wich he claims that B-Hop hits a lot harder as Pascal.
If Froch hit harder than Kovalev how come Pascal called Kovalev "uncle"? Remember how Kova laught his ass off when Pascal couldn't remember what's his corner? Epic
He's entitled to his opinion. The rest of the world is then entitled to say well Kovalev gave you beating and stopped you whereas you lost an entertaining and far more competitive war of attrition with Froch in points. This would suggest to us that Kovalev hits harder. I also wonder whether or not he'd still be saying this if a rematch wasn't inbound. He can hardly say "Kovalev is a murderous puncher who really hurt me and I expect to be knocked out again" can he?
Of course he's entitled to his opinion. No one said he wasn't. Pascal is also entitled to his opinion and, since he has been in the ring with both, I think he has the right to say who he thinks is the hardest puncher. I'm not saying that Froch hits harder than Kovalev. What I am saying is that I can accept Pascal's opinion about who he thinks hit him the hardest. I don't see why that is so hard to understand.
I dont believe it, Froch is no doubt heavy handed with everything he throws but this is the type of thing Boxers say before a fight. After he loses again he may well say Kovalev is the hardest hitter he has faced.
Different boxers punch hard in different ways. I feel Froch has the sledge hammer kind of hard, while Kovalev has the snapping kind of hard. I prefered getting hit with the second kind but this one also could get you knocked out.