Paul the punisher Williams the new Hitman Hearns??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by r_9-Ronaldo, Oct 30, 2008.


  1. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    Did we forgot he beat Margo already?
     
  2. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,174
    35,346
    Jun 23, 2005
    No the real insult to Hearns was in a thread earlier this week, when you and your delusional Margo hugging friends said that Hearns couldn't KO Margo, that's the real insult right there.:deal
     
  3. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    This content is protected
     
  4. rodney

    rodney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,332
    635
    Jun 16, 2006
    I dont think so.
    Not even close.
     
  5. The Phenom

    The Phenom Pretty Handsome Full Member

    4,245
    352
    Aug 30, 2008
  6. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    Co-Sign:deal
     
  7. PanchoVilla

    PanchoVilla Guest

    I dont think so.. Hearns was way more special in terms of skills and power.
     
  8. platnumpapi

    platnumpapi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,212
    4
    Jun 10, 2005
    The hitman had real ko power, im talking one hitter quitter.paul is a good boxer but his d is kinda of shity, i think hearns had better d then him as well.speed wise i might give it to paul.

    i think he is punnisher and not the hitman, thats still good though.
     
  9. Finn73

    Finn73 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,322
    0
    Jun 22, 2008
    Abraham would eat him for lunch at 160.

    Benn, Hearns, AA - they all have freakin punching power and Williams is not in the same league.
     
  10. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,174
    35,346
    Jun 23, 2005
    It's an insult because Hearns has one-shot ATG power and only a fool like yourself would even attempt to rationalize why a head first defense fighter like Margo would stand up to Hearns. Margo would've have been brutally KOed and made into a highlight reel for the ages if he ever fought Hearns to suggest anything else is lunacy and shows a lack of knowledge of boxing history.:deal
    BTW Williams is 1-0 against your hero and will kick his ass again if Margo ever gets the balls to face him.:hi:
     
  11. NeckBreaknAiken

    NeckBreaknAiken Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,014
    4
    Jul 30, 2008
    You can make your point without outright lies...

    Paul came in that ring at 159 EXACTLY! :good I KNOW FOR A FACT! (By the way, the same exact weight he entered in the ring against the Tijuana Chicken)

    You don't know a ****ing thing.

    None of this matters. I give Paul credit for avenging his loss. Something Margarito's ***** ASS is in no rush to do. Period.

    As far as the question... I don't think Paul is quite there yet, but at least he is willing to give it a shot, instead of "navigating" his way through the ranks after building a reputation of being all about pride.
     
  12. NeckBreaknAiken

    NeckBreaknAiken Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,014
    4
    Jul 30, 2008
    Only a pure unadulterated stupid ****ing hypocrite would talk about how Margarito should make Paul wait (for whatever boxing-politico reasons) and then try to talk **** about Paul's opponents. Meanwhile All the Margo-bitches cry "Well our God Margarito deserves to take the year off"...

    Pathetic.
     
  13. MexicanJew

    MexicanJew Jajajajajaja Full Member

    7,315
    3
    May 19, 2008
    He scores a freaky luck KO against Quintana and then knocks out made to lose Andy Kolle and suddenly he has this massive power. The Quintana KO was luck . If he had such power he wouldnt have gotten beaten so badly by him the first time. And Kolle is no measuring stick for power at all.
     
  14. SAS2

    SAS2 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,173
    2
    Jun 24, 2006
    ya gotta be joking! hearns never loses to a 'B' fighter like quintana...NEVER!
     
  15. pmfan

    pmfan Active Member Full Member

    1,408
    2
    May 11, 2008
    He's good. Hearns was a better fighter though, and a harder hitter. Hearns at welter may even have been able to dent Margarito's chin (not sure). Williams wasn't able to shake him up.

    In pure matchups, I rank Tommy as no. 3 welterweight all time. Not for quality of reign, but for who would beat who. Only two sugary fighters were better at that weight.