Paul Williams will whip Winky by dominating UD or late TKO!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jeff M, Feb 19, 2009.


  1. link2296

    link2296 Boxing Addict banned

    5,713
    1
    Apr 10, 2007
    if he does try to attack him, he will be in for a long night. Wink is an excellent counter puncher and has an excellent defense; and for some strange reason, Paul Williams is susceptible to the straight left hand counter, which is unusual for a southpaw.

    Trust me, the Punisher will beat him with a high but ineffective punch output.

    Most people on this forum forget that his fight with Margarito was very close. He didn't give Margarito a boxing lesson like you say. he won a very close UD (115-113 x2 and 116-112) in which he only landed 13% of his punches. Most of those punches caught the guard of the TJ cheater.

    Against elite level competition, I'm afraid paul won't look like the punisher. He will merely find a way to squeek out a victory.
     
  2. link2296

    link2296 Boxing Addict banned

    5,713
    1
    Apr 10, 2007
    dude, I can't believe you're even serious about your fight pick. Haye is just not prepared to face Wlad. He is in over his head...literally and figuritively. He doesn't realize what a complete fighter Wlad has turned into, like most klitschko detractors on this forum. Most haters like to point out the flaws of a fighter that doesn't exist any longer. Wlad is much improved and is going to whip Haye...and he will look impressive doing it.
     
  3. Jeff M

    Jeff M Future ESB HOF Full Member

    27,003
    132
    Nov 22, 2008
    dude you knowledge just sucks. Margarito won 4 rounds and that's how the only judge who had any noteworthy title fights saw it. Where do you come up with 13%? Williams threw 1083 punches and landed 22%. OWNED! He made Margacheato look like the amateur that he is!
     
  4. link2296

    link2296 Boxing Addict banned

    5,713
    1
    Apr 10, 2007
    Dude, compu-box had Paul Williams landing a lot less than 22%. Maybe your looking at power punches, not total punch output.

    Also, if Margarito had won the 12th round of that fight, he would have retained the title with a majority draw.

    Anyway, a lot of ringside observers thought that Margo had deserved a victory for landing the harder more effective punches. Paul was merely trying to survive during rounds 10 and 11, tying his man up every time he tried to come in.

    it's sounds like, as usual, you were watching the fight you wanted to see, rather than the fight that actually took place.
     
  5. Jeff M

    Jeff M Future ESB HOF Full Member

    27,003
    132
    Nov 22, 2008
    You're wrong again, badly. You go find some proof he landed 13% because you will never find it.
     
  6. Jeff M

    Jeff M Future ESB HOF Full Member

    27,003
    132
    Nov 22, 2008
    Actually Paul threw over 1200 punches and sure as hell did not land only 13%.
     
  7. link2296

    link2296 Boxing Addict banned

    5,713
    1
    Apr 10, 2007
    look it up on your dvd...a man with your extensive knowledge of everything boxing must have this fight on archive.

    Dude, face it...you don't know half as much as I when it comes to boxing.:good
     
  8. link2296

    link2296 Boxing Addict banned

    5,713
    1
    Apr 10, 2007
    He sure did, that's why Margarito thought he had won the fight. Nothing was landing during the first five rounds. He was simply playing patty-cake with Tony's gloves.

    Fortunately for Paul, Margarito didn't really start pressing the action until round number 7.

    it was a much closer fight than P-will fans care to remember.
     
  9. hmm

    hmm damn chairs Full Member

    4,992
    0
    Mar 19, 2009
    hmm says his heart goes for Winky but his head goes for Williams...
     
  10. Jeff M

    Jeff M Future ESB HOF Full Member

    27,003
    132
    Nov 22, 2008
    Yeah "Margo started too slow" argument again and that's why he gave away the first six rounds. You get dumber everyday. He took the loss crying like a ***** and as we all now know a cheater. It's real funny you even try and debate that anyone other than Margacheato nut-hugger would believe your non-sense, but they all dissapeared except you I guess. It's funny Paul beat him like that especially after Paul had to go to court just to get Margarito to fight his mandatory with him then the idiot takes 2 million to get KTFO by Shane instead of 4 million to get KTFO by Paul. Paul beat up Margie in sparring and got sent home so I guess cheato didn't use plaster for that session but that is obviously why Margarito avoided that mandatory for a year! Like I said, you find those punch stats showing 13% landed but you won't and you've been owned so quit making a bigger fool of yourself. :nono
     
  11. link2296

    link2296 Boxing Addict banned

    5,713
    1
    Apr 10, 2007
    you really should start watching some of these fights again, Jeff.

    I think you would be shocked at how different these fights truly are.

    To answer your accusation, I am not a fan of either fighter. i simply choose to watch the fights without bias, because I am a true fan of the sport.

    It's obvious who is winning this debate and making a more rational argument. I don't have to resort to insults and insinuations. I have logic and truth on my side, and you can't handle it.

    Truth is that the fight was close in everyones mind except for the P-will fans. If P-Will really wanted to make a statement, he should have stood up to the TJ cheat and not let Tony dictate the pace of the fight.

    And because you chose to bring up the Sugar/Margo fight, why didn't the Punisher beat him down like Shane? Why did he back up the entire fight? What were you thinking when you saw "the most avoided man in boxing" holding on for dear life in rounds 10 and 11?

    You never disappoint, Jeff...always letting your heart rule your mind.

    That's why I will always win every argument we have.:lol:
     
  12. Jeff M

    Jeff M Future ESB HOF Full Member

    27,003
    132
    Nov 22, 2008
    Obviously you need to watch that fight again and I'll be waiting for those punch stat numbers! See the fact you believe you're winning anything against me proves you have no clue what you're talking about. When you start trying to talk boxing you flat-out get owned.
     
  13. link2296

    link2296 Boxing Addict banned

    5,713
    1
    Apr 10, 2007
    Only in your mind, Jeff. This is coming from the same guy that thinks Bhop could beat Wlad K at heavyweight!!:lol:

    Why on earth would anyone who could make such a ridiculous claim think that he would own anyone in a boxing discussion?

    You are truly clueless, dude. You have no idea when reality ends and fantasy begins.

    Look, let's settle this argument with your pre-fight analysis and predictions. What is the next big fight on the calendar? Let's make a wager...and no I can't wait until June 20th. That's too far away.

    I want to put you in your place immediately!!

    your emotion for certain fighters absolutely blinds you.
     
  14. Grinder

    Grinder Dude, don't call me Dude Full Member

    5,853
    2,566
    Mar 24, 2005
    No way will Wililams KO Winky. He is too skilled and bigger than other guys Williams has fought.
     
  15. boricua100%

    boricua100% Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,748
    0
    Dec 15, 2008
    I think the time off the ring could hurt Winky but I still thuink he can give PW a good fight