Paulie: Canelo Can't Lose By Decision; Could Have Lost To Lara...

and like i said, what situation?i told you avoidance tactics are easy to see, and easy to understand why they get employed.

 

Thanks for pointing it out. Fixed. And no, Clenelo really lost both Golovkin fights.

 

Reread the posts. Utilize basic critical thinking skills. You'll get it.




















Maybe.

 

I know we'd like to believe that canelo has never won a match before. the only robbery I will accept is GGG 1 which GGG clearly won.

 

more avoidance? theres a surprise.

 

No avoidance at all. I think you'll find your way out of the maze.
















Maybe.

 

yeah, you got everyone convinced, lol.

 

I gave you the key, friend. Critical thinking skills. It's up to you to find your way out.

 

Malignaggi was one of the few honest analysts, which is why he ultimately lost his job. He's also been a pro boxer in the modern era so he would know a lot about antics behind the scenes, both PED wise and corruption wise.

 

you gave me a dance shuffle, you think is confusing someone. thats what you gave me. but hey, aint no law against mind****ing yourself.

 

This content is protected

 

Paulie, for some reason, never touched on Mayweather and PEDs. Never mentioned Floyd's name alongside PEDs. Maybe they're really good friends.

Who knows, but that's a subject he never touched on.

 

Like with many challenges that aren't presently solvable, some time away may prove to be the key. Take some time and come back to it. You'll figure it out.










Maybe.

 

everyone already has. thats why youre stuck avoiding, instead of directing. this isnt brain surgery.

 

Second time you've mentioned an audience. Kinda weird. Don't worry about anyone else.