Paulie M.: I dare Pacquiao to sue me

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigReg, Mar 17, 2010.


  1. 555east

    555east Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,948
    0
    Oct 24, 2007
    he certainly has a strong opinion on believing Pacquiao is on some sort of PED. and to think Paulie's said in other interviews about ripping Pac that it has nothing to do with jealousy

    I dunno but in my opinion talking about someone so much and in such a negative fashion (as Paulie has been doing in regards to Pac) really comes across as jealous


    I don't think it's kind of funny .. I find this very pathetic, and a very desperate attempt to talk his way into a fight vs Pacquiao. People like the fact that Paulie "speaks his mind"

    but all what he's really doing is running his mouth for attention ... and why should that be applauded?
     
  2. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    You're off base. I read the lawsuit. The complaint against Mayweather Jr. is that Mayweather Jr. went on a radio show and said that The Phillipines produces the best PEDs. Furthermore, Sr. clearly stated that it was his opinion that Pac was on something. It really doesn't matter though.
    Neither of these guys have any inside infromation that lead anyone to believe they were making statements of fact and they have never claimed to have had such information. Malignaggi straight up said that Pac is a cheater and is on something. He can say that because it's clear as day that he's giving his opinion.

    If any of these guys were Pac's former trainer, or conditioning coach, or sparring partner, or perhaps even a friend of his, Pacquiao might have a case. As it stands, none of these guys are a part of Pac's inner circle. None of them would know for sure whether or not Pacquiao is on anything and none of them claim to have any real evidence that he is on anything. To make matters worse, I see no evidence that Pacquiao has suffered any damage. This lawsuit seems to be a sham.
     
  3. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    I only hope it gets dropped from ESB REAL soon or the mods start moving this **** to the lounge. It could drag on for years since both sides have corporate suits to do the dicking around......
     
  4. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    The difference is there WAS evidence that Barry was using which is where the allegations stemmed. Manny's situation is that THERE IS NOT EVIDENCE or any foundation to support Floyd's accusations.
     
  5. roversbowers

    roversbowers Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,960
    0
    Jun 10, 2009
    id be more concerned with amir knocking u out pal
     
  6. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Thank you counselor. :roll:
     
  7. snakeface

    snakeface The Woodside Hurricane Full Member

    7,313
    0
    Feb 18, 2010
    oscar de la hoya is gonna say "****! ....what a khan job" that night at the garden...

    the fight being bigger than it is by roach being involved and a punishment order just makes it a lil more special. khan got some pack in them punches...(not pac)

    salita took him lightly and faced his first big test...minus matisyahu's spiritual ringwalk performance...and failed....taking him lightly was his fail... roach was key to that.

    roach knows malignaggi is a tough kid at least...but also knows he dont have the knockout power and that he can last many rounds without slowdown.
    this tells me that khan is going to go in and rush him... hurt him best he can quick
    maybe even work his body down..he is going to close the gap and stay in close and try to swarm him so that he dont have a chance to jab fest him.

    paulie needs to counter...keep the right amount of distance to pick him apart and then try and angle him with some shots and then get in to do some pounding.
     
  8. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    No need to be a smartass.
     

  9. Barry Bonds was on steroids, though. That is a fact that he himself admitted to a Grand Jury.


    The only thing he disputes is whether or not he knew what he was using, same as Shane Mosley. And if you don't know the answer to this one, here's a clue:


    When you want "vitamins" and "flaxseed oil", you go the pharmacy down the ****ing street. You don't call Victor Conte.
     
  10. snakeface

    snakeface The Woodside Hurricane Full Member

    7,313
    0
    Feb 18, 2010
    barry knew when his balls shrunk and his arms were tree trunks and his head was humongous with moose acne on his shoulders
     
  11. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Wasn't being one. Who are you to say Pac has no case? You aren't privy to the information Pac's team has. Nor do you have any information on Shane's case. Yet here you are saying how NEITHER has a case. You have NO CLUE how this has affected Pac financially or emotionally. Lets be honest, you defend floyd ALL the time. How is this any different?
     
  12. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Pac would never fight Malignaggi for the simple reason that Pac would not want random up to the fight testing, and Malignaggi would actually verbally expose Pac all through the promotion of this very fact.

    No Malignaggi fight for Pac even if Mallignaggi would by miracle beat Khan.
    Malignaggi would verbally tear down Pac to shreds in a way Pac could'nt do physically with any opponent he could find.....and the casual fan looking in would see the reality of Pac's hiding his PED use!:deal
     
  13. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    :lol: Jump the shark. That's just ridiculous Divac.
     
  14. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    I'm 99% confident PAC's case is going to be in his favor. It's just that Floyd and his team have stated things that suggest that "THEY KNOW" Manny is on something when they have NOTHING to back it up. The situation is that those comments that came from nowhere without any foundation did in fact catch some traction which caused Manny to have to defend himself in the media. Those questions are detrimental to his character which is a source of his living....being a boxer/entertainer or polotician...in PACs case pretty much all 3...those questions can be very destructive to future endorsements or could warp the way some view Manny which is the foundation of his lawsuit. It's not open and shut but Floyd and his family are making it easier for them to loose with their constant chatter about Manny. Digging themselves an even deeper and wider hole to pull themselves out of.
     
  15. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    Precisely.