Paulie Malignaggi "I do have something against Pacquiao! made his name off cheating!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mellamomarcos, Jul 27, 2015.


  1. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,061
    35,182
    Jun 23, 2005
    Look at all the dirty fighters that Dope Coach Roach had at his gym.:hi:
     
  2. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Really and the TMT fighters are all clean right :lol:
     
  3. Zaryu

    Zaryu Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,985
    43
    Dec 7, 2007
    I respect Paulie, but I don't respect his views on Pacquiao. The thing is, even if Pacquiao was on roids, everything he accomplished is still impressive. There have been numerous cheaters in this sport, and no one has ever accomplished what Pac has. In my opinion, Paulie is bitter that Pacquiao destroyed Cotto when he thought Cotto was going to beat him. Paulie said something along the line that if Pacquiao beat Cotto he would be one of the greatest fighters ever, but like Floyd Sr. He didn't give Pac any credit, he assumed Pacquiao was on something.

    He says that with drug testing Pacquiao didn't look too impresive, but I also disagree, the few times he landed flush on Floyd he buzzed him, he just couldn't deal with Floyd'so ring general ship and quickness.
     
  4. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,613
    Nov 5, 2013
    Paulie has a great point, Pac was on that juice. Everyone knows it.
     
  5. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,052
    24,037
    Feb 19, 2007
    of course there is, guys like you just pretend that there isnt because it makes you feel better about yourself. its like a band aid over your insecurities. maybe you pretend, just to **** off the pac****s, maybe you are that far removed from reality, i dont know. i just look at the evidence available.
     
  6. rhin0z>

    rhin0z> Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,405
    1,089
    Jul 13, 2014
    All good points from paulie. Anyone refuting the magic mans points one by one I would like to hear them.