Paulie Malignaggi is correct.

Paulie’s a smart man

 

The second fight was better to watch but I thought Golovkin clearly won.

 

Ok GGGirls, let's gather up.

 

I don't think so. If anything they favor the underdog in the even rounds.

 

ignoring the punch stats, I think Canelo's footwork helped him sway the judges in the close rounds, always coming forward made him look like the aggressor

 

Ok so if Canelo clearly won 3 of the 4 scoring criteria
Defense
Ring Generalship
Effective agression


Only thing left is clean punching.....

And Paulie even admits Canelos punches are more eye catching because of their explosiveness


Where is the robbery?

 

I think outright robberies at the top level are mercifully rare but a general rule is that the unfancied fighter has to win unequivocally whereas for the protected money maker / hometown draw, any draw or tight contest will go their way.

 

This why clen boy got a draw on one card against fluid then are was it a fair score

 

But that didn't count for shyte in the first fight
First fight ggg is the aggressor clen boy allegedly didn't run but boxer off the back foot lol
Second fight clen boy adopts ggg first fight and ggg something of a type of clen boys use of ring etc
This time the judges like ggg style but with clen boy using said method with more speed of foot



Oschers penning that open letter seems he knows he's damaged the sport once again


I remember when he said he's here to give back to boxing what it had done for him



Get back in the kitchen oscher

 

People are giving rounds to Canelo that they didnt give to GGG in the first fight......
That's the problem I have with the scorecards.

"It doesnt matter that GGG outlanded him, Canelo was the aggressor".


Well GGG did both in the first fight and was given 6 rounds.

 

Canelo won based on those scoring criteria's.

 

Yes that's how I feel. The scoring criteria is what they are, if you want to change them that's a different argument.


I had GGG winning the first fight.

I thought Canelo got unreasonably favorable scores vs Mayweather, Lara,Trout, Cotto, Khan

I personally believe that there may have been some bribery of judges in the past by Golden Boy because he ALWAYS seems to get the benefit of the doubt.


But this time, he won this fight.

Plus Steve Weisfeld is a good and imo honest judge

 

Paulie generally hates the business of boxing and wherever possible goes against judges, commissions, promoters, etc. He clearly feels like Boxing did him wrong throughout his career and he consistently lets that cloud his judgement. It's a shame as he's otherwise a very astute pundit.

Canelo won clearly.