Noooot really. It's pointless. It's like if someone says "I think (this is implied) [insert person here] is gross" and then they explain why. You can disagree but you can't tell them what they think is wrong because it isn't an objective thing. Also the difference between Klit and Artem is how they conduct themselves. If someone slaps Klit then it doesn't make him look that bad because he doesn't act like a borderline thug. Artem often does and in THAT world you can't run around getting slapped and do nothing about it. That is embarrassing to a lot of people. Which is why the poster said he was an embarrassment. You then acted you like you didn't understand why and it was explained to you and you STILL tried to argue otherwise for no reason. It doesn't matter if you think it is embarrassing or not. The poster above does and he was the one that made the claim. What is or is not embarrassing is entirely up to perspective so he is not wrong about what he said. Neither are you. You ARE wrong once you try to act like HE'S wrong for what HE said. Do you see the point of this now? He also said nothing about his fighting career at any point.