Malinaggi wants the fight, he has said that beating hatton gives him the chance to get a rematch with cotto, it makes sence for cotto, so for both fighters it makes sence. and it would sell madison square gardens out.
He wont beat Hatton either so it's all irrelevant. His whole reputation is built on being brave in a defeat, he's garbage.
no i think that he is a good fighter with excellent boxing skills, who on his day could cause many fighters problems.
Erm, no it couldn't. Hatton's reputation is built on wins over Zoo and Castillo mostly. and being a brawler.
Yes, perhaps he could give some other female boxers some trouble or perhaps other transexual ladyboys a hard time.... I take it you havent watched Ngoudo fight him I agree with you though, he's top P4P ladyboy boxer:good
Kostya Tszyu = shot Jose Luis Castillo = shot Carlos Mausa = who? Luis Collazo = he beat hatton Juan Urango = who? Juan Lazcano = gatekeeper
Thats your opinion, fine, ok, your welcome to it. But there is no way that "Hatton's reputation is built on losing bravely" thats nonsense, admit it, and and thats why your trying to change the subject on to Hattons resume.
Its difficult to argue this:good Undisputed, to be honest there are a handful of more competitive fights for Cotto and Malignaggi....Cotto-Malignaggi2 would just not be competitive....Cotto has developed a great deal since that fight and many would argue that Paulie has slipped considerably since then...Hence me clowning around on this circus thread
Tszyu - bollocks Castillo - fair enough Maussa - WBA title holder, starched Viv Harris (ok shite- but unified titles) Collazo - didn't beat Hatton, close fight Urango - Ricky had chest infection, still won easy, that win will get better in time Lazcano - fair enough, still won easily If you are trying to discredit Hatton, you got to do better than that.