Paulie Malinaggi vs Miguel Cotto 2

Ricardo Torres was a nobody at the time, whilst Witter would have been a backward step.

If you have a newly won title and are the linear champ, the two biggest names in your division are tied up elsewhere, and the other beltholder is available and up for it, what do you do?

It's a no-brainer :deal

If he had fought a lightweight you would have accused him of beating up a smaller man - if he had moved up he would have been running scared of someone.

I never said Lazcano was **** - I simply said he was chosen for a reason. There is a difference.

 

The WBA title is meaningless?

You have just proven the other guy's point - you really are clueless.

If he had taken Witter, say and won - you would now be accusing him of hiding behind his title rather than chasing unification.

 

Undisputed, All your trying to do is discredit Hatton! The whole Malinaggi Cotto 2 speal was probally just a lead to get onto the Hatton bashing. Every thing you have said on this thread is plain ******ed!

 

If Hatton wins you can bet that I will be finding this thread and highlighting this comment for sure.

By the way, I don't see any Hatton fan boys on here.

 

Did Malginaggi say he plans to move up to 147?

 

Well isn't it kind of obvious that I'm not a Hatton fan boy seeing as though I've not said one single thing to defend him? or the fact that I said I think Malignaggi might win? I like Hatton, I want British fighters to do well, but I'm not a fanboy.

 

Cottos was weak , weight drained and lees experienced right now Mallignaggi have been getting worse since that fight have improivd ****, and is getting hit a lot more, Cotto this time wil finish the job more easier.