Pavilk Vs Hearn's

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by gl26, May 17, 2008.


  1. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Like flies to ****.....:lol:
     
  2. Samurai

    Samurai I lost an avatar bet Full Member

    3,634
    4
    Mar 30, 2008
    Oh, that is what it is then...a wind up. Great way to start off being a new member, you know..trolling an all.

    Dumbass.
     
  3. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,921
    35
    Mar 31, 2007
    Of course that is correct and I should have been more clear with that post. What I meant was, I always see the detractors bitching about the Hagler vs. Pavlik threads, etc.. as some sort of proof that all Pavlik fans are ****-tards.

    As you said very well in your post, these kind of match-ups are silly because we have the whole picture of a Ring Legend vs. A Kid whose not even made his first defense of his first title.
     
  4. MrSmall

    MrSmall Member Full Member

    142
    7
    Jan 2, 2006
    Hearns is a far superior boxer.
     
  5. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,921
    35
    Mar 31, 2007
    No ****. Glad he picked Pavlik to use for his bull ****.
     
  6. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,921
    35
    Mar 31, 2007
    Indeed, using what we currently know about each one couldn't argue. It would be far more fair to have this discussion in 4-5 years though, when Pavlik's had his chance to create his own legacy.
     
  7. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,921
    35
    Mar 31, 2007
    cuchulain, this is the type of post of which I spoke.
     
  8. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Taylor WON the belts. Pavlik beat Taylor. How does that make Pavlik "overrated"? What rating system do you use? :patsch
     
  9. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    160 was not the best weight for Hearns: his height/reach advantage wasn't as pronounced as it was at the lower weights, but he would outbox Pavlik in the extreme. Much, much better footwork, movement, virtually everything. Pavlik's a hell of a fighter, but he's nowhere near Hearns' league.
     
  10. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    He was a far superior boxer to Barkley, as well. The wild card with Hearns was never his skills- which were always world class- it was his chin, which wasn't; likely due to how he was built and how skinny his neck was. If Pavlik doesn't stop Tommy, I don't see any reason not to pick a Hearns UD or stoppage win. But Pavlik's got enough of a punch to make me not want to bet on this, if it were to happen. Too live an underdog to take the risk on.
     
  11. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,276
    21
    Mar 14, 2005
     
  12. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,276
    21
    Mar 14, 2005

    Speak english ya no good street trash!!!!:bbb
     
  13. Undisputed P4P

    Undisputed P4P esb FBL & FIFA 12 champ Full Member

    3,368
    1
    Apr 24, 2008
    Hearns with anialate pavlik with ease,

    Hearns KO RD 3
     
  14. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by corrales is god
    do you relize wat da **** you are sayin. pavlik beat an overrated taylor and a brawler in miranda thats it along with 30 other nobodys . your obvisously not da fan you think you are. DISGRACE



    Well, maybe that is what he meant when he said, "DISGRACE". :lol:
     
  15. gl26

    gl26 Active Member Full Member

    524
    0
    Apr 28, 2008
    HEY MAN **** YOU:fy