Pavlik is barely even one-dimensional

He showed his true colors and it didn't surprise me one bit.

 

Just like a frieght train you know where he's gonna hit you! So if you move to the left or right (laterall movement) of a train it'll miss you!:hey

 

Shhhh.....

 

Yep, he isn't. He has worked on his boxing more. You really don't watch his fights do you?

 

I wasn't implying Pavlik was, I was asking that because the original poster made it sound like there was actually room for something less than one dimensional

Besides, I've had Pavlik's back on a number of things. I'm no hater. :thumbsup

 

Sorry. My sarcasm meter got readjusted over the past few days. A fighter can't win a fight without hate now days.

 

I'm always a little surprised by the fact that very few posters on ESB can appreciate a fighter for what he is. Pavlik is a stalker, plain and simple, that's his style. He is very good at what he does, and he does far more than people generally give him credit for.

It always cracks me up when posters call me a blind nut hugger and claim I think Pavlik is perect. The fact is, I was THE VERY FIRST poster on ESB to lay out a clear and concise anti-pavlik fight plan, and say that's how ya beat KP. As it turned out, BHop fought almost exactly like I said an opponent would need to fight to beat Pav.

 

Anyone who thinks Felix Sturm is even remotely comparable to Bernard Hopkins needs to be thrown off a cliff.

 

It's cool dude. :good

Kelly knocked the ring rust off, which was the most important aspect of the matchup because you don't want that hanging over your head going into a bigger fight. I'll only get irked if I don't see his team parlay the Espino fight into a more meaningful one within the next 6 months.

 

It depends whether you're talking about mathematics, spatial relations (and whether Euclidean or not), topology, or common nomenclature.

Lemme get all Euclidean on your ass... a three-dimensional object has depth because it is built out of two-dimensional objects (the connection between points on a cube are lines) and a two-dimensional object, like the shapes you used to draw on the x-y axis in geometry class is a series of lines connecting the one-dimensional dots together. A zero-dimensional object can't really be perceived as an object because it can't be used as a reference point.

That help?

I suppose a one-dimensional boxer would have exactly one punch, like a Rock'em Sock'em Robot. But, if trained by the right physicist, could learn variations of that one punch, like fighting a batting cage. A zero-dimensional boxer wouldn't even be in the ring... either an opponent everyone ducks or Zelenoff.
Actually, that's not fair: a zero-dimensional fighter would have no punches to throw, like an even worse Kevin Johnson.

 

If Pavlik doesn't get a fight with Williams or Sturm in short order, I do not think it will be for lack of trying. He cleary wants Williams, and the only reason Pavlik/Sturm hasn't already happened is money; the offer from HBO was silly. KP said he'll be back in the gym in 3 weeks. And, judging from the right side of Espino's face I'd say Pav's hand is just fine.

 

that is top shelf. one of the things i like best about esb. There are a lot of people on esb that try to make funny posts but fall very short but every once in a while you get a gem. Well done.

 

Presumably, a point would be zero-dimensional.

 

:bananamaniac
:yepatsch:yep