Pavlik is he relevant anymore

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by THN, Jul 7, 2012.


  1. RightCross

    RightCross Grandmaster of Boxing Full Member

    10,533
    3
    Aug 3, 2004
    I'll tell yuo what looked good. his stamina, he ahsnt been in that figthign shape fro a while.
     
  2. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    If his jab won't be effective at 168 and he can't make 160 then he should retire.
     
  3. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    He didn't have a guy that could push him so it's hard to judge his stamina. Will didn't have the power to hurt him so he wasn't pushed.
     
  4. tito44

    tito44 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,585
    6
    Oct 25, 2009
    Of the fighters he mentioned he should go for Froch. Kessler I think would hurt him, and Ward is way too fast.
     
  5. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Well, Rosinsky wasn't a mover before this fight either so Froch may well change up his game plan too.
     
  6. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,920
    35
    Mar 31, 2007

    Well he was SURE AS **** movin' this time. Jeezus, dude was like a fly buzzing around in there.
     
  7. tito44

    tito44 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,585
    6
    Oct 25, 2009
    He was running his ass off, landing good shots but he would not plant his feet for a second.
     
  8. puncher

    puncher Member Full Member

    342
    0
    Mar 14, 2012
    Yeah good point. I would definitely pick Froch to win even if he doesn't move around too much but if he wanted to make things easier for himself he would. Pavlik should be the underdog in any of the big fights but I don't exactly think it would be a huge waste of time, he would make a scrap out of it and if he loses atleast he did get that one last shot.
     
  9. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    At least Garcia keeps him in shape and he is showing for the fights.
     
  10. |A|C|S|

    |A|C|S| Boxing Junkie banned

    12,964
    0
    Mar 7, 2012
    Pavlik has been terrible since he came back, he needs to go back down to 160 where he had size advantages over people. Froch,Ward,Dirrell and Kessler would all destroy him, i think he'd have a chance against Bute by knockin him out but wouldnt be suprised if Bute schooled him
     
  11. king khan

    king khan Boxing Junkie banned

    10,733
    0
    Apr 9, 2012
    We really don't know yet, because he has not fought a relevant super middleweight. . . Or relevant guy at all since he has came back from his alcohol rehabilitation.

    Rosinski fought Edwin Rodriguez, who I consider a top ten SMW, in a close fight (even though the scorecards read a shutout for La Bomba). . .

    Rosinski is NOT a bad little boxer/mover at all. . .

    The only way to tell if Pavlik is relevant, is by seeing him against a relevant, top ten SMW. . .

    I think Edwin Rodriguez is the obvious choice for next opponent. . .
     
  12. gr33nfather

    gr33nfather Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,188
    4
    Sep 27, 2008
    what about all his ****ing tatoos, its ****ing ugly what the hell happened
     
  13. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    Pavlik's never going to get back to where he was in 2007/2008. He's regressed, he's aged, and he's fighting bigger guys. His best punch now is the left hook to the body. The (double) jabs and right hands aren't utilized as much for whatever reason.
     
  14. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    He is done at the world championship level.
     
  15. Alexandra park

    Alexandra park Active Member Full Member

    846
    2
    Feb 10, 2012
    abraham must be next for me. good yardstick and a step up. hes still relevant as i feel he may improve when he really has to, but a smw champ in waiting, he is not. a serious test for more fighters than people on here reckon though, imo