Pavlik is not small

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Quickhands21, Oct 23, 2008.


  1. AbbeyFN

    AbbeyFN Active Member Full Member

    982
    0
    May 5, 2007
    Plus, Calzaghe beat Hopkins...nuff' said! lol
     
  2. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Paul Williams is taller and has a greater reach than Hopkins too. Thomas Hearns has both in favour of Mike Tyson.

    Height and reach are not the only criteria.

    It's about how a fighter carries himself at that weight and, because of that, I don't think Pavlik can fight effectively above 160lbs.
     
  3. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Pavlik is gigantic at middleweight, everyone knows that. He is taller than Hopkins, and he only jumped a little over 1 weight class, as the fight was fought only 2lbs above the supermiddleweight limit, far closer than it was to light-heavy. Plus Pavlik had already fought at 166lbs- a massive 4lbs away from the limit for the Hopkins fight.

    Any attempt to discredit Hopkins's win will FAIL.
     
  4. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    And looked nowhere near as good against the same opponent as he did 6lbs below.

    Some fighters just don't move up well. Ricky Hatton or Wilfredo Gomez, for instance.
     
  5. Gatekeeper78

    Gatekeeper78 Active Member Full Member

    674
    0
    Jul 28, 2008
    You make stupid people feel smart. That is a fact.:deal
     
  6. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Ricky Hatton was very small at welterweight, that was obvious. Pavlik is not small above middleweight, he is still huge. I know you hate Hopkins, but seriously, size is not an excuse in this case. Give a guy credit where it's due.
     
  7. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    I don't hate Hopkins at all. I just hate his deluded fans who think he is something special. I've had four avatars on this forum in all the time I've been here. Earnie Shavers, George Foreman, Aaron Pryor and....Bernard Hopkins.

    So if you think I'm biased against him, you're wrong.

    I just see things from a different perspective when it comes to him. I think the majority of his biggest wins weren't great achievements and people overstate things like his age, which doesn't mean anything to me.
     
  8. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Our viewpoints are too divergent to bother continuing. To me, Hopkins is just a true Master Boxer.
     
  9. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    3,589
    1
    Feb 24, 2005
    This is correct PACFAN.
     
  10. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    3,589
    1
    Feb 24, 2005
    Hopkins is THE Master Boxer right now.
     
  11. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    He is the most skilled fighter in the world at this precise moment, JMM second as Jones and Toney are no longer what they were.
     
  12. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    Of course he is a master boxer, he is THE LEGEND after all.

    But obviously you guys haven't seen Calderon fight! :D
     
  13. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    Although Pavlik was built like a girlscout at 170 in comparison to Hopkins it had absolutely no effect on the outcome.
     
  14. Stezzie

    Stezzie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,277
    1
    Dec 23, 2004
    There will always be excuses...
     
  15. PRproud

    PRproud Active Member Full Member

    1,004
    0
    Dec 9, 2007
    Trinidad a natural 147 welterweight

    Pavlik a natural 160 middleweight....period. so why the excuses?

    Pavlik is as big and strong as Hopkins.