Pavlik looked bad vs a bum!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by SomeGuy101, Apr 1, 2012.


  1. SomeGuy101

    SomeGuy101 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,965
    0
    Oct 16, 2009
    Pavlik's opponent had a five year layoff and then one single fight vs a 10-9-2 bum before fighting Pavlik!

    Pavlik had zero snap to his punches an got clipped moreso than a pro of his 'level' should vs this bum.

    That guy wouldn't have lasted one round with the Kelly of old. He's basically trying to become a boxer but at his age he can't do it. Ask any pro or serious boxer analyst boxers can't change 15 years of style in their 30's.

    Terrible fight, terrible showing.
     
  2. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,920
    35
    Mar 31, 2007
  3. PivotPunch

    PivotPunch Guest

    Terrible thread, terrible poster
     
  4. dbouziane

    dbouziane ............. Full Member

    11,049
    27
    Nov 4, 2007
    killer story bruh
     
  5. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,602
    Jul 22, 2004
  6. Swollen Liver

    Swollen Liver Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,737
    237
    Oct 3, 2010
    I don't think he looked bad at all even if the guy in front of him was a bum.
     
  7. maciek4

    maciek4 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,407
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    The guy had a weak chin and no snap on his punches but he looked well conditioned and was as tall as Pavlik and had a respectable record. Pavlik could have taken him out in the 1st no problem but wasnt looking for the KO, was there to put his punches together. Good performance by PAvlik
     
  8. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
  9. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Can't say "April Fools". You are a full time fool. :yep
     
  10. SomeGuy101

    SomeGuy101 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,965
    0
    Oct 16, 2009
    Well I tell you what lets all see how far he goes then. I got a rep, I'm rarely wrong when it comes to breaking down fights lets see how far he goes. Paper belt at most I reckon.

    Bookmark this thread & prove me wrong when he 'demolishes' a credible belt holder folks lets see Kelly 'The Great' back in action since you all seem to feel he can restructure his fighting style so well. Kelly's going nowwhere of prominence in a hurry I promise you that.
     
  11. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    68
    Mar 11, 2006
    I wouldn't say it was good or bad. He didn't show anything either way, I don't think. He was against an opponent who was seriously overmatched so it doesn't really answer any questions about Pavlik. I thought he looked physically strong though, which is a positive, but I don't think you can take much else from the fight.
     
  12. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    Tough crowd. I guess he could have done better, like if he had a gun or a bat. Would have got him outta there within a round instead of taking two.
     
  13. KayEpps

    KayEpps Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,693
    1
    Jul 25, 2007
    I was waiting for the "April Fool" joke.

    Guess he looked bad getting a TKO in the 2nd round.
     
  14. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Wow. Getting a belt proves a guy is a bad now days?:huh
     
  15. bazza12

    bazza12 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,561
    5
    Sep 26, 2009
    This. Right now Pavlik just needs to stay sober, stay in the gym and get back in the ring regularly.

    Pavlik's biggest problems were never his ability as a boxer, but personal issues. If he can control/eradicate them, then he can get back to where he was, at world level.

    Cannot for the life of me believe anyone would have the stupidity to make any kind of a judgement based on that fight. Ridiculous.