Pavlik v. Dawson at 168, if both had 6 months to prepare; who wins?

Yes sir, Magnum signed back on MSN last night and we talked boxing a little. He confirmed everything I have ever said about Pavlik, so just give up.

Magnum went as far as picking Vernon Forrest over Pavlik and when I thought about it hard, I could see how it was a distinct possibility.

Dawson though? Grow up December, I mean, BEAR.:huh

No more PAVLIK.:tired

 

Grow.Up. Pavlik gets destroyed by elite fighters, deal with it.

 

A fighter's chin gets significantly worse when they're weight-drained. Dawson would be very drained at 168. Dawson's defense has regressed ever since he switched trainers, and has become much more hittable. Pavlik has the kind of frame where he should be able to carry up power, probably all the way to 175. I suspect Kelly would win by T/KO.

 

God help us....

 

Where I have been turned on the issue of Dawson vs Pavlik.

Forrest would get knocked the **** out. Of that I have no doubt, :yep

 

Here's the question - if Dawson had boiled down to 168 before the Adamek fight, do you think he would have won? I personally don't, and I'm not sure how fighting Pavlik would be all that different.

 

Howabout the 1 year avatar bet though?

Dawson has zero problems making 175.. he doesn't even drain to make LHW. At a pre-fight weighin weeks before the Johnson fight I think he was in the lower 170's.

You should just post transcripts on here of your conversations with Magnum.

 

Dawson said as recently as one month ago that he has no problems making 168 lbs. In fact, he should really fight at 168 lbs. He has to build up to 175 lbs; he comes into training camp at around 172 lbs, with fat to be taken off...!

 

Pavlik by instant death

 

:huh

Grow up? OK, Peter!

Changed my name because people couldn't spell "Decebal"...which wasn't my real name either, so it doesn't matter..."a rose by any other name...", etc

 

Now you see Amsterdam, that's just being a *****.:yep

Surely being a grown man you know how to communicate with others with out being such an ass hole all the time.

Did I say in my post: Oh my god Pavlik rules!!11one11? Or did I simply say the outcome given Decebal's stipulations is debateable??

Grow the **** up.

 

Anyone have any other insights? A new slant on the same facts?:think

 

Peter?:huh

Now what did I tell you on not taking anything seriously.:bart

 

I don't feel that the crudity of this forum populace is fitting enough for the words of a God, Sir Huki.

 

Have we come to the rightful conclusion Pavlik gets murdered yet?