Pavlik vs. Froch at 168

Come on man.. It is hard to take someone so extremely subjective seriously. If you admitted that your fighter isn't some superhuman perfect boxer it would be much better to have a debate with you.

Clowning is a mistake, just like Froch made a mistake. He got up and was fine. Pavlik got up and was hurt badly.

 

Did you watch Froch vs Jean Pascal?

 

You don't understand boxing. Froch wasn't hurt. Was he shakey? Were his legs gone? No, he was fine.

 

The windmills? Yes.

 

Agree!

 

froch for me by decision

 

i noticed everyone thinks this one thinks a ko victory for either fighter is the most likely outcome. nope

pavlik would win a decision. similar to the taylor fight but froch's late comeback wouldn't be enough to beat kelly.

but we all know that pavlik aint ever gonna fight at 168. cos he got schooled by bhop last time and now his value dropped like a lead weight.

 

Anyone who watched those two knockdowns, knows Pavlik was hurt much more. He was on ***** St. for a long time, whereas Froch was in control and took an 8 count.

Aside from that, Taylor was stronger at 168lbs and hit harder. He also landed many more flush shots without hurting Froch. Pavlik was hurt several times by Hopkins, yet look at the shots Froch took against Pascal. A true granite chin. Pavlik has a great chin, but behind Froch's.

 

You make me want to see Pavlik get knocked out, Joey Gamache style, you obnoxious, biased, deluded, arse licking, moron.

Or just another schooling that embarasses the sport, like Pavlik's pathetic attempt at beating an old man.

 

Ironically, you don't know Jack yourself.

 

I think at 168 there are some difficult opponents for Pavlik. Froch is definitely one of them. It will be a very good fight, but I´ll pick Froch to win it by KO in rounds 9-12.

 

Hermit scored Pavlik - Hopkins 120-108 for Kelly.

 

Hermit lists Hopkins-Pavlik as one of the greatest robberies of all time.

 

He adores Pavlik.

 

lmao... Pavlik loses every poll these days.