Pavlik vs prime Hearns or prime Hagler at 160

Pavlik gets stopped by both.

 

Hearns' power is overrated at 160 and i see Pavlik stopping him in 7...but Hagler does everything better than Pavlik and stops him in 10...

 

We have a winner.

 

No chance. Hearns would smash him with a combinatin of jabs, right hands, and left hands to the body.

Watch Hearns hit people to the body with his left hand. HE was one mean *******, much more than the right hand banger seem to think these days.

He was an excellent boxer, and had huge power. And his chin wasn't quite as shaky as people like to make out these days.

He would bust Pavlik up big time. Not a 1 or 2 rounder, but Pavlik would be pounded to the head and body, and stopped in the mid rounds.

hagler just grinds him into the ground.

 

lol your stupid, Hearns was chinney but it's not like he couldn't take a punch. Remember Hearns vs Barkely II? Hearns went 12 rounds with Barkely in one of the most brutal LHW fights. To beat Hearns you have to go war with him and get inside, something Pavlik does not do. Pavlik is a boxer/puncher who's slow, Hearns is two classes above Pavlik.

 

Iran barkely was a slugger/boxer, that's how he beat Hearns by using his reach against him, it was a wrong stylistic matchup for him. Pavlik likes to fight within range of his opponents and that favors Hearns, Hearns would just bomb him with straight rights and he would be done.