Pavlik vs. Taylor II Controversy

I don't think it was close at all to be honest. Pavlik won clearly.

 

Here's what people think.... poll

[url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=47057[/url]

 

Your right I dont think it was that close as Im a Pavlik fan but saw Taylor win that fight.

 

The fight sucked and Pavlik turned out to be only "very good".

 

I'm just gonna change my name to "Taylor Won" and have done with it.

 

My feelings exactly. I thought the judge who scored it 116-112 had it right on the money.:yep

 

There's no controversy in that result. That's another UNANIMOUS DECISSION being questioned by NUTHUGGERS and NOOBS here.

Maybe this is more of these self proclaimed boxing fans not understanding how a 10 POINT MUST SYSTEM works.

All rounds maybe closely contested . . . but in the end when the total score is tallied it's not gonna be always close . . . because the other fighter can get more rounds than the other depending on how the judges sees it. The desparity doesn't matter because they all gave more rounds to the right winner that's why it's unanimous. :yep

We all see things differently. People can only complain and my have a case to complain if it's a split decission.