Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by CST80, Dec 22, 2018.
That clown couldn't even judge a wet t-shirt contest, let alone a boxing match.
Do you think this guy hates certain fighters?
His score was obnoxious. No surprise there.
This content is protected
As if jermell is crying post fight..."i dont even play video games, coz i dont like losing".
Iam embarrssed for him, embarrasing for the sport.
Actual tears. Wow
Havent seen the fight not going to bother, watched him once robbed trout imo, not a pure robbery but bad cards.
Talks like hes made of adamantium, but he cried after a loss, in front of the cameras and even worse in front of his brother. Got no time for that. Fake hard man exposed
It’s hilarious how the usual suspect idiots are saying “I’m a Wilder fan doe and I had Fury winning. See?! Unbiased!”
Like they really went out on a limb there! One of the most thorough schooling’s in years other than two knockdowns yet they were UNBIASED enough to have Fury winning that fight rather than being in the hopeless 15% of the population that had Deontey winning
I think it's telling that even the people who scored for Charlo did it 7-5.
Not even the people who had Jermall winning want to put it out there that he won 8 or more rounds like the judges did. Thats the definition of home town advantage. Korobov could've scored three knockdowns and only won an SD.
There's nothing I find more hilarious than all of the Charlo's won easy talk from numbnuts all over the web. Most of it from the sweet science crowd, the same ones that obnoxiously love to attempt to school people on how to score a match when a match is literally too close to call, usually reflexively in favor of the slick elusive fighter involved, are now trying to flip the script and make the argument in vain, that two come forward aggressors missing more than they connect, in some cases by a mile, having many of their jabs parried, and eating flush counters repeatedly, sometimes in combination, actually won both matches. Its the absolute height of repulsive intellectual dishonesty, and they end up looking like agenda driven lemmings and novices who literally DKSAB in an effort to push a narrative that doesn't match reality. Is it that hard to admit when a fighter you like, didn't do enough to win? At least there's arguments to be made when matches are nip and tuck back and forth affairs, with both men doing their things and successfully, but when one guy is clearly edging most of the rounds, and all of these supposed experts conveniently don't notice how well the opponent is doing, only serves to make them look like hypocrites and fools. Honesty is the best policy, unless you really believe what you're saying, and if that's the case, you don't comprehend this sport as well as you think you do.
Jermallo got exposed as a Houston hype job by the pale shadow of the geriatric shell of Korobov's decrepit shot ghost.
Apparently landing 56 jabs is some kind of amazing feat deserving of a round of applause
The expression on Jermallo's face when someone informs him of this monumental achievement. He looks like all six of his numbers have come in on the Mega Millions lottery lol
Read some of the controversy on this fight and thought I’d watch and score it myself, this is my scorecard and analysis which I took from my scoring recent fights thread
If you had any questions as to media bias (and you shouldn't, it's there), just take a look at US boxing media coverage and how much they're overreacting to Harrison getting the win and down playing the Korobov performance.
I've seen Harrison's win called shocking, controversial, and the worst score in years. No exaggeration. The best I've seen for Korobov is that 119-108 is too wide. They're going out of their way to assure everyone Charlo won and that most believe it.
We know how some of those PBC dollars get spent, but it's still sadly hilarious to see grown men on the payroll spin things. Company men in the truest sense of the word.
They can try and sell us that the Charlos had a 2-0 night, but nobody's buying it.
Both Charlos skills are overrated.
They are young fast and athletic but skill level just slightly above average.
Harrison vs charlo
I had it 7-4-1 or 8-4 for Harrison
He dictated the pace and fought a smart and tactical fight.
Korobov vs Charlo
I had it 7-5 for Korobov
I had korobov winning the first 5 rounds
And to me he just looked like the superior boxer to me. With all due respect to jermall...
Hell of a rant, and once again, Dwyer is spot o in his assessment, especially about that scumbag Hazzard.
This content is protected
Let me guess , he's 'woke'...
Me too. In fact when I had a shave today I did so with a pelican perching on my cawk