When are any of them going to fight their mandatories? Why do they hold belts if they are not going to defend them. They are big money fighters so they actually don't need to fight for belts. They are hold up Aydin and Brook from challenging for a title with the WBC and WBO.
they dont have to do anything..they can fight whoever they want to cause they bring in big money.not fair at all but neither is life
No they are above belts. If they dont like the mandatories. They lose the belt.:scaredas: You think Manny and Floyd give a **** if they lose it?
floyd just won the belt vs ortiz in sept...its his first fight since pac has only had his 9 or 10 months.... i think they give anyone 18 months....
WBO has a special rule so they can override Mandatory if they declare a fight a super fight or some ****. They arnt breaking thier own rules.
no they dont lose the belt because their % sanction fee is more then anyone else they are above the rules, usually the lol "board" can ,make little changes for the rich or a payout - like they way kostya paid the IBF 30k and kept that title while outta action like the way oscar had not had a fight in 444 days then fought vargas in unification etc etc etc
fightnews rankings has Aydin as PBF's and Jones for Pac. I believe Jones is also a number one at IBF and will fight Bailey. I could have sworn Brook was the number one for Pac.
This is why belt are a joke. If Floyd and PAC had incentives to defend their belts when facing their mandatories then everything would fall into place. they would want to bring on a mandatories and all of the other fighters would fight each other in order to get a shot. But if the top guys don't go by the rules then everything turns into a free for all.