PBF: "I Don't Use Plaster Or Fight At Catchweights"

did floyd fought at catchweight? :huh

someone proclaiming to have a superior education could not even distinguish a question if it's answerable by yes or no.

do you have floyd's dick in your ass? <- not answerable by "yes" or "no" according to this fool. atsch

 

another ***** addition to the list. do you guys really have no shame? you would argue anything just to defend your boy floyd's BS. :-(

*****s: floyd has not fought at catchweight, he is correct.

 

so why did he paid marquez up if it's not a catchweight fight?

 

I gave you two options, dumbass, so it clearly wasn't a "yes or no". You chose to ignore the two options and answer with a "no", which didn't answer the question. Also, where did I proclaim that I had a superior education? That's right, I didn't need to because it's blatantly obvious. :yep

Read the ****ing thread, moron, and you'll find my answer. I'm not here to repeat things over and over for you because you're too stupid to retain information that was given to you five minutes ago.

 

you're the very first ***** to put this excuse up. the contract was chnaged so it's not a catchweight anymore right? so when did they changed the contract, a day or two before the fight?

marquez and floyd both signed up for a 144 fight. is this correct?

is 144 a catchweight or not?

i know you don't want to answer them questions because this topic is ahrd for you and it would only expose you guys as a floyd defender no matter what the circusmtance are. if you guys just admit in the first palce that it's a catchweight fight like other posters and some objective floyd fans did, then you could have spared us all the trouble. but you guys need to absolve floyd on this hypocritical quote as usual.

 

Again, your **** poor reading comprehension skills are showing. Did you really miss the part that said "contract or not"? Yes, the fight contract stipulated a catchweight. No, Floyd did not fight at a catchweight. Very simple **** to understand for those of us who made it past elementary school.

 

my question is this only:

did floyd fought at catchweight? YES or NO?

you have problem answering them and would rather give BS statements.

 

This is why I just troll your ****** ass because I don't respect you as a poster.

The fight was advertised as a welterweight fight. Floyds team kept saying it was a welterweight fight. Schaefer confirmed the contract was for welterweight with the addition of the penalties. These are not excuses, they are facts. The contract was changed days before the fight, so did they fight at a catchweight? No.

You just can't seem to come to terms with that.

 

nice ***** excuse just like what bladegunner said.

so signing to fight at a catchweight but missing it means he did not fought at catchweight? *****logic at it's best.

it's still a catchweight fight where both marquez and floyd signed to fight on. floyd being unprofessional and deliberately missing the weight doesn't mean he has not fought at it (a catchweight fight).

 

If you weren't a complete ****ing moron you wouldn't continue asking that same question over and over again after I've clearly already answered it.

Go back and read, dip****. :dead

 

It does actually. What kind of ****ing moron would even suggest that he fought at a catchweight when he clearly didn't as evidenced by the fact that he was forced to pay a penalty for not weighing in at the catchweight?

 

a welterweight fight is anywhere between just above 140 to 147. :huh

so floyd changed it a day before the fight. big deal, it was not a catchweight fight anymore right? so why did floyd need to pay marquez up if it's not a catchweight fight already?

 

Nobody in the whole ****ing world respects pugi period. I say this with 100% certainty. :yep

 

yeah your answer is no. just like the other *****s here. all of you are the same breed.

 

A welterweight fight is a fight with a weight limit of 147lbs.

What did Floyd weigh in at for this fight, fliptard? :think