**PBF v ODLH: Did the judges were partial or impartial...**

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Orishaman, Dec 29, 2007.


Page 1 of 4
  1. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    After watching the ODLH v PBF the other night , I ahve to question their partialiaty..eventhough ODLH fought bravely, and performed far better than I expected...I didn;t see him winning the fight since his pressure was inneffective and PBF was beating his to the punch...but the fact that he was able to back up PBF to the ropes and he did punch high output, eventhough they were inneffective, and the fact that he was ODLH, it probably gain him 1 to 2 rounds, which was enough to make the fight closer than what it really was....

    If it would have been anyone else with the same attack and work rate as ODLH on that fight the margin of Victory would have been on the range of 117-111 or so.....
     
    Orishaman, Dec 29, 2007
    Orishaman, Dec 29, 2007
    #1
  2. ChampionsForever

    ChampionsForever ESB VIP

    4,053
    1
    Dec 3, 2004
    This content is protected
     
    ChampionsForever, Dec 29, 2007
    ChampionsForever, Dec 29, 2007
    #2
  3. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    I scored the fight 7-5, Floyd. What is it you are saying exactly?
     
    196osh, Dec 29, 2007
    196osh, Dec 29, 2007
    #3
  4. the_truth

    the_truth Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,042
    0
    Oct 15, 2005
    I also had Mayweather winning this one 7-5...
     
    the_truth, Dec 29, 2007
    the_truth, Dec 29, 2007
    #4
  5. michael 901

    michael 901 His ass is tired Full Member

    657
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    i had it 116-113 floyd
     
    michael 901, Dec 29, 2007
    michael 901, Dec 29, 2007
    #5
  6. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    I scored it 9-3 for Floyd. He was landing pretty much all of the clean punches. DLH resorted to trying to steal round. Someone posted that there were no clear rounds for either fighter. I disagree. DLH definately won the 7th. There's no way in hell anyone should not have scored the 10th and 11th rounds for Floyd.
     
    BigReg, Dec 29, 2007
    BigReg, Dec 29, 2007
    #6
  7. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    What I am saying is that I ahd the fight 117-111 PBF , but the fact that it was ODLH, and he fought bravelly, the judges probably give him the benefit of the doubt in 1 or two rounds, making it far closer than what it really was...if it would have been any other fighter, 117-111 would ahve been the score....that's what I am saying
     
    Orishaman, Dec 29, 2007
    Orishaman, Dec 29, 2007
    #7
  8. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    I thought the fight was pretty close through 9-10 rounds then Floyd pulled away towards the end.

    No shame in this loss for Hoya.Semi retired and out of his prime he did pretty good for himself with what Mayweather gave him too work with.
     
    PolishPummler, Dec 29, 2007
    PolishPummler, Dec 29, 2007
    #8
  9. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    You guys are missing the point of this thread:patsch

    Waht I am saying is that clearly ODLH got help forom the judges to make the fight closer than it really was....they put far more weight scoring the rounds for ODLH on aggressiveness that "effective aggressivenes"
     
    Orishaman, Dec 29, 2007
    Orishaman, Dec 29, 2007
    #9
  10. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    I think some were just scoring DLH thrown punches and aggression, though they were clearly not effective. I think they were impartial though.

    Mayweather clearly won the fight using the criteria set out by Lederman every fight. I had him winning 116-112.
     
    kg0208, Dec 29, 2007
    kg0208, Dec 29, 2007
    #10
  11. the_truth

    the_truth Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,042
    0
    Oct 15, 2005
    I know the point of the thread, but if it was any other fighter I still would have had it 7-5.... the whole fight was close until the last few rounds were mayweather pull away for the decision... thats just my opinion....
     
    the_truth, Dec 29, 2007
    the_truth, Dec 29, 2007
    #11
  12. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    Disagreed..but if you agree then you have to agree that id 35 year old ODSLH was able to put that kind of pressure against PBF, Cotto would also...and far more effective...

    27 years old legs of Cotto the streght of Cotto and speed of Cotto as better than the 35 year old version of ODLH that fought PBF...
     
    Orishaman, Dec 29, 2007
    Orishaman, Dec 29, 2007
    #12
  13. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    the key is "effective aggression" ..not just aggression..
     
    Orishaman, Dec 29, 2007
    Orishaman, Dec 29, 2007
    #13
  14. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    This isn't necessarily true. PBF wouldn't agree to fight in a smaller ring like he did against DLH. And Hoya is much larger than Cotto meaning he only had to get in the area of Mayweather to cause Mayweather to move to create space.
     
    kg0208, Dec 29, 2007
    kg0208, Dec 29, 2007
    #14
  15. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Oscar didn't deserve a 115-113 nod, but I can see a 115-113 nod for Floyd. I thought Floyd won 116-112 because of the reasons you stated.

    I have an EXTREMELY hard time seeing how Oscar could have won, although he was a game opponent and competitive.
     
    brooklyn1550, Dec 29, 2007
    brooklyn1550, Dec 29, 2007
    #15
Page 1 of 4