PBFs corner jumps in the ring for a brawl and that's within the rules?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by saul_ir34, Mar 26, 2012.


  1. The DQ should not have happened. The officials should have considered the confusion the timing of the incident caused and let the fight continue.

    And if you ask me, Judah and Mayweather could have both been DQ'd that night. Judah for his blatantly intentional balls/rabbit punch combo, and Mayweather because of Roger jumping onto the ring apron and not letting the ref handle business. That being said, I was happy they bent the rules a little that night of the Mayweather Judah fiasco because I paid $50 for that piece of **** and at least they let the fight conclude.

    As far as your "90%" statistic, I haven't really done any research on it but it seems like you might be overstating that a bit. It was clear that the DQ was BS.
     
  2. KayEpps

    KayEpps Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,693
    1
    Jul 25, 2007
    This was a State's Rule - not a Boxing Rule.

    Judah didn't fight Mayweather in Texas. Those are just he facts.
     
  3. Cellz831

    Cellz831 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,344
    3
    Oct 21, 2011
    this guy is the biggest mexican crybaby on ESB.
     
  4. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    If time is stopped, whatever happens before time is called in isn't part of the round right? :huh
     
  5. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,943
    3,300
    Apr 26, 2010
    Floyd should have been DQ'd per the rules, and Kirkland didn't refuse to provide a urine sample, he wasn't able to **** on command before the fight. Great post/thread :good
     
  6. Jaguar

    Jaguar Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,181
    1
    May 12, 2005
    Floyd fan here saying that the DQ was bull****.

    Per the rules Floyd should have been DQ'd but that ref wasn't an idiot and let the fight continue.
     
  7. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,943
    3,300
    Apr 26, 2010
    How do you arrive at the conclusion all these posters you refer to are black? What makes you think that...because they disagree with you?
     
  8. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    Neither fighter should have been DQed. What happened to Molina was ridiculous and it's hard for somebody to not call that a fix. This **** is worse than bribing judges
     
  9. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things. Full Member

    47,836
    36,579
    Apr 17, 2011
    Those are some ****ed up rules. Molina should have been DQ´d for the clinching or get a few points deducted. The DQ was utter bull****.
     
  10. Phat_Ass_Dude

    Phat_Ass_Dude Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,340
    0
    Jun 29, 2011
    If you wanna just rant about what happened during that fight, that's fine...But there is no need to make up a bunch of bull**** and straight lies.
     
  11. Emeritus

    Emeritus Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,109
    1
    Jan 22, 2010
    Who is agreeing with the DQ?

    Most people from what I have seen only disliked Molina performance (holding) No one wanted to see him lose like that!

    Also regarding Kirkland "refusing" to give a urine sample, can you please at least be honest....Kirland was unable to give a urine sample not that he refused. Since you want to use Floyd as an example remember on 24/7 when Floyd was unable to give a urine same to the testers you didn't hear people (including yourself Im sure) claiming that Floyd REFUSED to give a sample.

    The problem with Chavez Jr was a) he is a proven cheat and b) because of a) he should never be allowed to miss a test, especially considering how easy they are to beat in boxing and c) he was caught drunk only 2 weeks before the fight which might indicate he would have problems making weight.

    Kirkland from what I have been told might have got his training (dropping of weight to be exact) wrong and was struggling to make the weight and didn't hydrate properly.

    Lastly Mayweather vs Judah imo I'm all for using some descretion and I think the right man won, I dont want to see Mayweather lose because his uncle was stupid even though by the letter of the law he should have been. I dont know what true boxing fan would have wanted Mayweather to get DQ'd under those circumstances - only Mayweather haters really!

    IMHO Kirkland vs Molina should be ruled a NC and they should do it again (which Kirkland and Ann Wolfe have both said they are more than happy to do so)
     
  12. jeffjoiner

    jeffjoiner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,183
    5
    Jun 22, 2008

    You are bringing in things that have nothing to do with the stoppage. On Saturday night, the referee used a very strict interpretation of the rules.

    What the other posters say has nothing to do with it, nor does the behavior of Mayweather's corner.

    Technically, the stoppage on Saturday was right. And I like Molina and was glad to see him winning.
     
  13. Cellz831

    Cellz831 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,344
    3
    Oct 21, 2011
    :lol: exactly. 90%? wtf is he smokin. nobody, not even Kirkland fans were happy with the DQ. i wanted to see the rest of the fight so i could see Molina get KTFO in the 11th.

    the DQ was bull****. if the ref wanted to DQ him, it should have been for the holding