PEDerson-Holt Drug Tests – what’s going on?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Uncle Rico, Apr 3, 2013.


  1. Stylez G.

    Stylez G. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,237
    13
    Dec 11, 2012

    I'm not sure what you're trying to convey, but the testing agency, the IBF, Holt, Holt's promoter and GBP have all confirmed it was Holt's test that was atypical.
     
  2. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things.

    51,097
    40,933
    Apr 17, 2011
    But he did not notify the commission. They had no idea.
     
  3. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    I'm saying the 'atypical' label being used could be a way of brushing everything under the carpet. I've just seen that statement by Holt, and it still reads unsure as to what those results are. I'm beginning to believe nothing will happen from this.
     
  4. Stylez G.

    Stylez G. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,237
    13
    Dec 11, 2012

    Who's brushing what under the table, and why?
     
  5. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Hatman. Who dya' think!
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,236
    Sep 15, 2009
    Holt got an a-typical result. could be medical. peterson was clean.
     
  7. Stylez G.

    Stylez G. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,237
    13
    Dec 11, 2012

    I don't know, you're the one who said it. From everything I've read about this, it seems pretty cut and dry. However, you're alluding to some sort of cover up and I'm struggling to understand how you've come to this conclusion.
     
  8. Stylez G.

    Stylez G. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,237
    13
    Dec 11, 2012

    This pretty much sums it up.
     
  9. LikeFatherNSon

    LikeFatherNSon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,004
    4
    Jun 21, 2012
    A vivid imagination coupled with a low IQ would be my guess.
     
  10. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Hmm, I don't know, the fact that:
    • The person who it had originally claimed failed, was a known PED user.
    • The commission, which is the home of that PED user, kept the results of the tests for a whole month -- despite repeated requests -- whilst reassuring everyone they were clean. Except for the fact that, you know, they weren't clean.
    • The promoter of one of the fighters have a history of ignoring failed tests (see Garcia-Morales) and cancelling signed testing procedures at the very last minute (see Quillen-Winky) to ensure their events go ahead.
    So, forgive me for being a little bit skeptical of everything.
     
  11. LikeFatherNSon

    LikeFatherNSon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,004
    4
    Jun 21, 2012
    :lol: :lol:

    Who the f*ck is it?
     
  12. lewishamboy

    lewishamboy Styles Impetuous Full Member

    9,101
    0
    Jul 15, 2007
    Do you really need to ask that question? The answer is as obvious as answers come
     
  13. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    PEDerson, you stupid twat. It was claimed that PEDerson was the one who failed.
     
  14. lewishamboy

    lewishamboy Styles Impetuous Full Member

    9,101
    0
    Jul 15, 2007
    This. Holt getting a nice payday to take the fall
     
  15. Stylez G.

    Stylez G. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,237
    13
    Dec 11, 2012
    Lem Satterfield is the one who made the claim. He retracted his claim and his source apparently has issues with Peterson.

    They told everyone that both parties passed their tests, which was 100% correct. An atypical result is not the same as a failed result. Elevated hcg levels could be a signal that someone has cancer. Cancer is pretty serious, and it's understandable that the testing agency would want to do it's due dilliegence


    Anyone can be skeptical and are entitled to their own opinions. Everyone is not entitled to their own facts. There is clearly nothing out of the ordinary here if you simply look at the facts. You don't know all the facts, are coming up with your own interpretation of other facts, and as a result have come up with your own conspiricy theory which doesn't seem to make much sense. Wait, it makes sense only if you believe the IBF, WADA, GBP, and Gary Shaw are all in bed with eachother as part of a mass conspiricy to conceal drug test results.