People actually thought Quillin was better then David lemieux?

Murray > Lemieux > Quillin

 

regardless of whether GGG would have beaten quillin
everybody was in FACT saying he was the man to beat at 160

 

So wait, if you look better against all the common opponents that **** doesn't matter bedcause "triangle theory!!!!", both of their resumes are about even anyway.

It's clear Lemieux is a better fighter. Just because GGG made him look like a bum doesn't mean he wouldn't destroy Quillin.

 

Right, bums. GGG does beat them all, including Jacobs. I agree.

But you guys are too much. Everything is so one-sided. No objectivity. Carry on.

 

How about the fact that Marco Antonio Rubio made him look like a bum?

 

He was, and still is. Lemieux got knocked out by one journeyman jr. middleweight and got his ears boxed off by another. Quillin got caught cold in the first round by the second best middleweight in the world.

 

They are about the same to me so a fight between Quillin and Lemieux would be interesting.

As others have said, traingle theories don't always work in boxing. Levels obviously matter, but so do styles. Also, power isn't everything. Mayweather and many others have proven that. Lemieux may hit harder, but he would find it harder to land cleanly on Peter than Peter would on Lemieux.

 

He was young first of all, fighters can learn. Rubio is underrated.

 

Regardless of arguments about the merits of triangle theory and resumes, I would love to see Quillin vs Lemieux made - bombs away!

 

Quillin is about the same level as Rosado. Quillin has more raw power, but Rosado is more skillful while having decent power. Rosado was destroyed by Lemieux, while Quillin was struggling with him and was only saved by Rosado's cut.

 

Hard to compare like that. Marco Antonio Rubio blasted Lemiuex and lost to Chavez Jr.

 

And people a really think Lemiuex is better than Quilen based on what now ? I would love to see a fight between these two