People are so stupid.... Kessler vs Dawson

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PugilisticPower, Nov 13, 2008.


  1. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,301
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  2. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    First class, Bodysnatcher. Johnson's DVD set is impossible to find, and he has a very limited library. They used to have some of his stuff on eBay, but they started cracking down. Sucks.
     
  3. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    since when are Tarver and Reid legends
     
  4. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,301
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  5. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    lmao, touche:rofl
     
  6. ya-ni

    ya-ni Guest

    For the record,,,,,,Lacy is better then dawson, this was guy who if not for joe beat down, would have a real good shot, if not the faviriot to beat taylor this weekend, i can't see dawson beating a game taylor,, dawson needs about four more fights before he goes up against a kessler or a calahge, he will get hurt if he dosn't, just go ask lacy...........kessler should focus on 168, it is a tougher division right now then 175, an if he claims that divison, joe still might be around, then he might get his rematch,,,he got bute, the winner of lacy an taylor, i wouldn't mind him fighting abrahahm, at catch weight...
     
  7. tylerrcurtis

    tylerrcurtis Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,533
    2
    Aug 15, 2008
    1st off reid is no legend and 2nd glen johnson is not a journeymen he is a damn good fighter
     
  8. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Have people loss their dam minds ????? Lacy beter than Dawson ???? Man crack kills !
     
  9. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,301
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  10. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    6,002
    1
    Aug 14, 2007
    The noobs are getting pretty sickening around here.
     
  11. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    6,002
    1
    Aug 14, 2007
    If you're going to post, post something worthwhile rather than slinging ****--in an unfunny way I might add--at two of the better posters around here.
     
  12. 41fever

    41fever Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,811
    0
    Jul 16, 2005
    u can't compare Glen Johnson with Omar Sheika. However, that would be a good fight between the two, Glen by KO
     
  13. Borincano

    Borincano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,261
    7
    Mar 1, 2008
    Jeez, it seems that alot of fighters beat Johnson. Joe will tire Dawson and stop him late. After the Jones fight, I had to watch more of Joe's fights and I believe posters are underrating his skills. Dawson had trouble with Johnson and looked spent in the Tarver twelve round which I did not see, but am going by an article. Joe work rate would be too much. Face it, Joe is for real. Kessler, Jones, Hopkins, and the Mitchell fight was something else. He will beat him with experience and intelligence and then who is next? There will always be another fighter and then and then and then.
     
  14. denilo

    denilo Member Full Member

    316
    0
    Sep 28, 2007
     
  15. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    lol, I was waiting for someone to bring that up, ****ing clowns trying to give me **** about comparing Sheika and Johnson when Sheika BEAT Johnson in a fight.

    Remember, Lacy was considered to have better resume than Joe Calzaghe at the time they fought on the back of his wins over Pemberton, Vanderpool, Sheika and Reid, because he made Reid quit.

    Short term memory loss isn't my issue, it's your issue. Lacy was seen as too powerful, too strong and too much pressure for Joe Calzaghe because he had dominated his fights.

    The fact that you can't see the obvious comparisons, because you're too busy believing **** that is easily refuted (OMG SHEIKA AND JOHNSON?!?!?!) only goes to show why a majority of you can't be expected to know anything about 168.

    At 168 - Reid was as effective as Tarver was at 175.

    At 168 - Sheika was as effective (more effective considering he won) than Johnson was at 168 or 175.

    At 168 - Vanderpool wasn't quite the success of Adamek, Adamek is the better win and the better fighter, although Vanderpool was thoroughly more tested and had fought better names.

    Absolutely comical though, people getting offended at the comparisons, the Sheika Johnson one is the most hilarious exhibit of idiots who don't have a ****ing clue running their mouth in a boxing forum.

    Tarver and Johnson? Highly rated because they beat Jones Jr... nothing more, nothing less. Look at their multiple losses since.

    Adamek? What has he done since losing to Dawson? He went close with Paul Briggs who is nothing more than a gatekeeper at best.

    Blindness is fantastic... ps "Do you know the circumstance of Sheika vs Johnson"

    Why yes, I do.. It was a very hard fought, close majority decision but there was no way in hell it was a robbery, the very reason Sheika got the Calzaghe fight was because Calzaghe was looking to fight Johnson at the time and took Sheika due to the win.

    Johnson may have got screwed in one or two fights, but not this one. Yet another example of fanbois for American recognised fighters who have limited to no clue about fighters from other areas.