People don't generally believe Ward could beat a prime Calzaghe do they?

commonwealth, you liar. when froch was calling him out at that time, calzaghe chose instead to fight weaklings veit, ashira and salem. only veit is excused because the wbo somehow felt it was a mando.


And to whom, when froch was nothing barely out of single figure fights, he had offered a "world" title defence to.

Failey lies again. almost every post of failey is being exposed as a lie.

 

BIG ASSUMPTION TO CLAIM HE BEATS THOUGH.
and besides NOONE would think that since froch would go on to claim world titles unified - INFACT COMPLETELY OPPOSITE TO YOUR CLAIM IT WOULD HAVE ENHANCED JOES LEGACY.

Super Hans lies exposed.

and yet your ilk claim that Calzaghe didn't go to America for years because he was earning big money in Cardiff?? YET SUDDENLY WHEN JONES IS SHOT CALZAGHE ACCORDING TO YOU NEEDS THE CASH???

The only thing not grasped here is the nature of your self contradictory lies by you.

 

Calzaghe has 6 extra years on Ward, why you comparing the two?

You ought to be comparing BY AGE. In that respect Calzaghe is behind almost all the very best SMWs. by age 30, Calzaghe had fought...Reid and that's it, and for the least important title too.
Ward is light years ahead of that by age 30. The different is gargantuan.


Your lies have been exposed. FLOP.

 

That's circumstances.

How was it his fault that Kessler and Froch already had losses on their resumes when he fought them?

You can't hold that against him.

 

:good

 

Where has there been a cop out?

 

your replies with lies you moron.

How many times do you need to be told?

Is it some kind of gay love for JC that keeps you in denial? Hes straight, give up you have no chance.

 

Froch was British champ also at that time

****** said to thesun.co.uk “He [Froch] would not have beaten Joe Calzaghe…twice I offered Froch the Calzaghe fight but both times he stalled. He knew Calzaghe was as tough as him, yet far more quicker and more skilled.”
http://www.boxingnews24.com/2013/06/******-froch-wouldnt-have-beaten-joe-calzaghe/

Froch was also mentioning Calzaghes name, but not about facing him before he fought Kessler, but after, where he didnt bring as much to the table as Hopkins and didnt win a world title till over a year after Calzaghe left SMW. So Calzaghe fighting Veit and co, has no impact on Froch not fighting Calzaghe

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/boxing/10935/FROCH-S-OUT-TO-ROCK-JOE

 

He is using the current Ring ratings dip****, he is looking at who Ward fought in the current rating

 

Did he look to fight Bute?

 

You really need to get those issues sorted out Herol :barf

 

why are you countering me by telling me something that's TRUE ALONGSIDE WHAT I SAID. I said COMMONWEALTH AS WELL, you moron.

You appear to be trying to build an argument when you don't have one to build. You are arguing with yourself.

yes it does, you lie. Froch keeps calling, Calzaghe keeps running in fear as with dawson and co.

 

he is using fighters from after joe was 30.

why you complaining about me pointing out there error of his ways?

 

So its Wards fault that Bte has lost his undefeated record, yes?

Ward can fight Bute any time he likes, and I bet you he will if Bute stays in form.



How many undefeated fighters did Calzaghe beat? Kessler...hmm. and that was when he was finished.

IS WARD FINISHED????

NO> DONT COMPARE UNLIKES<> COMPARE LIKE 4 LIKE.

Capitalized because you fail to understand it.

 

Thats obvious as to why isnt it atsch. ward wasnt exactly around when Calzaghe was in his 20s atsch.
You see, this is why I tend to not notice your posts or read many of them, because when I do, I end up schooling you like a fool and it just further confirms how irrelevant you are. Think I was wrong to waste time on this one, because I cant believe you can be so daft