Exactly. I have absolutely no problem with Hagler ranking higher, I just tend to lean towards Hopkins.
e=the cobra]I know very well that Hamsho, Sibson, Roldan, and the majority of Hagler's middleweight opposition were superior to the likes of Eastman, Joppy, David-Jackson (but their not on different levels), and I can see why this would make you rank Hagler higher. [/quote] Wait, Hamsho's beyond John David Jackson why? The JDJ that was unbeaten for a decade and avoided by nearly everyone?
Yeah, Jackson retired after one or two fights following the knock out loss to Hopkins. Hamsho at his best was superior to this version of JDJ.
Hamsho was the far easier fighter to fight as well. One of the crudest fighters you'll ever seen. Guess it depends on if you want ultra slick with skills and chin problems or crude with a great chin when measuring fighters.
The majority of JDJ's slickness and skills had been diminished by the time B-Hop fought him. He was still far more polished fighter than Hamsho, but his chin was far more exposed by this time and he had slowed down.