People need more lessons at chin school

His defense was not his chin he sucked at his defense period. Julio Cesar Chavez also had a epic chin but his defense was light years away from from Margo's. Margo is not fighting no more and that's because he had no defense, his chin was not his defense that's why he lost to elite fighters.

Did he have cast in his gloves? What does it matter what he had? He should have had nothing but what he was supposed to have. He was exposed as a cheat and put others life at risk. The only reason why you gag on Margo's d1ck is because PAC beat him, so its just your sorry attempt to hype up PAC. You defend Margo who was actually exposed as a cheat and have evedince of his cheating , yet you crucify jmm who has never tested positive only because he put your god out in nap time. Go back to your cave *******. Its clear your only a PAC fan and have no creditability to discuss actual boxing.

 

I'm not forcing my views on you. They are facts. Margo was exposed as a cheat, his coach admitted that it was his fault and Margo is trying to play the innocent guy. Lab results also confirmed similar to the making of
Plaster of Paris. Also its noted they they found another similar pad in his dressing room. Again, these are facts and laboratory confirmed. You can't pick and choose what you decide is false or not. If jmm or Floyd tested positive, like you claim they are with no shred of proof, then I wouldn't argue it with you. But Margo is a confirmed cheat and there is proof of it. Again, you only became a fan of his because PAC demolished him and Floyd didint fight Margo, so you use Margo as a excuse to call Floyd a duck and PAC a all time great. Don't act dumb lol, you spew the same crap every day no one believes you are actually in this fourm to discuss boxing. Again tell me about what I said is not a fact.

 

A top 3 welter? Lol gtfo out here, dude had fought some bum in mexico and because he was a top rank fighter with a name, Bob did his promotional work and fooled idiots like you to make you think Margo was worthy.

You can feel how you want about Margo cheating, again there is actual proof but you will undermine that simply to use Margo as your ploy to discredit Floyd. I won't go into why its bull because every one here knows you for the clown you are.

When Margo challenged Floyd, it was well known that floyd and Bob were having differences. Just like Chavez Jr is having issues with Bob, bob is trying to get Chavez Jr to sign his life away to top rank to fight GGG, but unlike PAC, Chavez Jr knows Bob is a snake so he refuses to fight until he gets what he wants or his contract is up. Do you also think Chavez Jr is a duck lol. You look dumber with every lame post you try to argue with.

 

Leave the Chin talk to the professionals kiddo.

 

You name call boxers who are in a combat sport for a living, you sit at home or your call center job and call them cowards from the comfort of the internet, I think its clear you diserve the name calling.

There is proof that he cheated from laboratory . if he was not guilty why would his coach have taken the blame for it? Obviously to save margo. Why couldn't they hire lawyers and argue the verdict?

He was lincesed because it brought money and you know it. If you recall Nevada did deny him a lincese and that's why the fight was in Dallas.

 

But why would he have been accused any way? That's b.s if they knew they were innocent they would of argued it, Margo was well off then and could of afforded a good lawyer. He took the blame to save Margo point blank, no one benefited from accusing Margo of illegal hand wraps, he brought that upon himself. Coincidentally as soon as he gets busted he goes on to only win 1 more fight against a no name bum in mexico, a unranked opponent and you claim after that Margo was #3 welter lol.

 

Cotto vs Margo 2 went 10 rounds and Margo had not hurt cotto or done anything spectacular either. He got out boxed for 10 rounds. I agree with the stoppage, had it gone 2 more rounds Margo probably would of had a marble for a eye . Robert Garcia practically let Margo almost loose his eye in the pac fight, the fight should of been stopped and Margo as a warrior wanted to continue. A real coach, has to protect their fighters, they have to see past the "warrior" mentality and care for their safety. Had Robert stopped it earlier Margo would of probably still been around. Cotto vs Margo 2 was a good stoppage, cotto knew he had a damaged eye and went to tag it all night, its strategy. Margo's eye was swollen and completely closed. Nothing wrong with that win.


The cost of going through with a dispute would of showed Margo wanted to prove his innocence. It would of shown he was willing to have the fact showed in front of a jury to prove he was not a cheat. Instead his coach took the blame and Margo is still labeled a cheat, atleasf if he had gone to court he would of had his chance to clear his name, but he didn't have a case because it was proven in a lab.

If the lab proved that they were tampered with, how can you dispute facts.

 

You still haven't mentioned why you think he was innocent despite having actual proof of tampered wraps. You seem to think any fight where some one boxes is considered "running" . it's boxing and cotto did a good job. Destroying Margo's eye further is strategy, why wouldn't he target his eye knowing is damaged? Any one would of done the same thing.

What was PAC doing in the Rios vs PAC fight? Boxing, he didn't play in Rios's game plan. He moved and boxed. But of course you won't say he was running because he is your god.

Do you not like cotto because he fought Floyd? Are you trying to make Margo look better because its one fighter Floyd has not fought that PAC did? You know, many feel cotto is pac's best win and I happen to agree