People rate GGG above Froch??

WHAT, are you saying froch is a better fighter than lomachenko ?

holy sh!t froch is so over rated its sickening. I pray you're being sarcastic here

p4p is your in ring abilities, not who is on ones resume WIN or LOSE. people that can pick up on true talent need about 4/5 real fights against a couple different styled world class opponents.

NO they do NOT have to against ELITE fighters for some of us to be able to answer the questions that need to be answered in determining ones in ring ability.

I think some of you go strictly off resume to rank fighters, that's not the only way or even the best way

 

How about Bute, Pascal, Groves and Dirrell? - controversial or not.

 

dude, froch got embarrassed against dirrell and even froch's biggest fans would NEVER claim he made it a competitively close fight.

was a one sided whoopin. Jean Pascal, I know he beat him and that is far and away his best win but I don't rate him as a true top fighter. and Groves is a contender on HIS BEST ever day.

he did desytroy butes career which I LOVED that. but bute was literally KO'd by Andrade in the first fight. stamina and chin are both TERRIBLE

I"ll give you pascal but he isn't close to elite, solid C+ in the pro world. I don't know how he ever made that 168 weight though, crazy how much weight fighters will drain

 

that was controversial, that was flat out robbery.
you cannot give me 1 straight minute in that match that froch controlled NOR can you give me a round that was not dirrells.

that is a really bad fight for froch fans to claim he competed against dirrell, dirrell made him look like a bum, literally a BUM. robberies that bad should have immediate rematch and that ruled a ND . you cannot find ANY froch parts in that whole fight. he was outboxed badl for 9/10 rounds then beaten to a pulp in the final 2 rounds.

how the commission doesn't step in when dirty sh!t like that happens is beyond me. that made pac Bradley 1 look like a 2 way war that truly was dead even

 

dirrell did NOT run, he moved an made froch look like a bum.
tell me ONE round where you could legitimately claim it was a froch round. JUST ONE

 

there is NO way I believe you truly believe that decision was jest. you're trying to strengthen your argument for froch, FACT is froch got outboxed then beat around the ring like a ragdoll.

give me ONE round, JUST ONE that you can say with a straight face that froch edged

 

Groves ( came off a win against Degale an Olympic gold medalist and solid contender), Bute ( an actual reigning champ something GGG hasn't fought), Pascal( went on to beat Dawson and one of Kovalevs best wins) and Dirrel ( who most of this American site thinks Froch did win see the poll).

While GGGs best prime win who ? I know MM is his best win and he's known for not beating yesterday's champs, Rubio is ancient, and Geale was never any good.

 

But don't worry Prime Martin Murray who already failed to capture a title twice is so much better.......

 

I don't believe anyone scored 7 rounds to froch in the world outside the corrupt judges that had their score cards filled out in advance.

when you get an hour or so, forget a whole round, give me 1 full minute where froch has any success what so ever

 

There was a poll most of this site felt Froch won get over it.

 

Froch is a top 10 P4P fighter has been for years. GGG has a lot more to do in order to live up to that.

 

I'm a big Froch fan but I was absolutely stunned when he got that decision against Andre. It wasn't 12-0 as you're making it out to be. But I had it 8-4 and I could see a case for 9-3. Calling Pascal a C+ fighter is way over the top. He's a very good, but not great, fighter. Much more B+ than C+. It undermines your argument to overstate things in such a way.

 

no one said murray I better than anyone, what I am stating is the fact trip G has so much more in ring ability its laughable to claim froch is anywhere near Trip G level.

some need to review resumes to be able to form their personal rankings. I go off what the fighters show in the ring and Trip G has been in the ring with more than enough world class fighters of every style for fans to be able to determine what he has.

he has so much more than froch it's not fighters that should be spoken of in the same sentence. froch has not one single attribute that comes close to ANY of GGG's.

just so many levels apart they really shouldn't be fighting in the same league