Yet they cant solve his style and beat these MoFo's like crazy. Just shows what they think about Pac's past opponents. Its like saying their Garbage and thats Disrespectful to EM, MAB, JMM, ODLH, Hatton, and Cotto because their great fighters. Just saying. Then they say... " you can be one dimensional and still be great " WTF! Please Explain how the hell you be this great while doing the same **** everytime?
Shut the **** up noob! Die while your at it. You just signed up to troll? What a Fool! Or. your one of Nalleges **** buddy here?
EM was shot and old. He had been fighting pro for a very long time and was obviously at the very end of his career by the time Pac beat him. Oh, and a shot EM still whooped Pacquiao. Imagine what a peak prime Morales does to him. MAB was a great fighter, who had been pro for about 15 fights, and had lost a step or two. Amongst those who followed his career, it was common knowledge his had lost a step or two since the EM's fights. It was evident against Johnny Tapia and Kevin Kelly. If you can't see how he had slowed down, and wasn't the fighter he once was then meh... JMM was a great opponent. Im their first bout I had JMM winning 9 rounds to 3. In the second fight I had JMM winning 8 rounds to 4. Many major phillipine media outlets had JMM winning. Pacdbest came to ESB and claimed he had the fight a draw. For the king of *******s, and a proven biased nuthugger, scoring it a draw actualy meant he thought JMM did enough to win. ODLH in his prime would mop the florr with Pacquiao. Oscar was not only shot, but weightdrained. Anyone who says that the DLH that Pac fought was even a fraction of what he once was hasn't been following boxing very long. Hatton was a decent win. Don't expect to see Hatton in any top 200 ATG lists. Cotto was a nice win, mainly based on who Cotto is today. Cotto has always been a paper champ, and had been brutally beaten to a pulp by Tony. he hasn't been the same since Margarito, and most who have followed his career will tell you the same. Tito was one dimensional and was great. It is very possible. Fact of the matter is that Pac's greatest wins were against two shot fighters that in their prime would have beat him. The first Morales fight is evidence enough.
So tell me who was he suppose to fight on the same timeframe he fought those guys so he can be Great on your standards?
ODLH is a fighter who hardly ever fought someone coming off a loss. The definition of taking on anyone and all.
People act as if being one-dimensional is a bad thing. Pac is very good at his one-dimension and many ATGs have been as well. One-dimensional in the fact that he doesn't have a plan A, B or C. If his all out attack doesn't work then what? Pac's one-dimensional style will be his downfall against some fighters with PBF being at the top of the list who can take advantage of this.
So EM, ODLH, MAB, Hatton, JMM and Cotto dont have a Plan A, B or C when they fought Pac. So meaning their one dimensional too? I wanna see a reply to this.
Still waiting for your answer. So tell me who was he suppose to fight on the same timeframe he fought those guys so he can be Great on your standards?