Chavez was involved in as many wars if not more than Barrera was by the time Pac fought him, leading up to to the Pac figh Barrera was also coming of the best stretch of his career while Chavez was coming of a stretch where he got beat by Randall and got a gift in his second fight with Randall.Barrera was ranked top 5 pound for pound higher that what Chavez was at the time of the DLH fight Pac fought Barrera in what was arguably Barrera's best division while Oscar fought Chavez two divisions above Chavez best weight. After the DLH fight Chavez never did anything else noteworthy in his career while Barrera went on to beat Morales. DLH was in his prime against Chavez while Pac hadnt reached his peak yet. With all these things considered only a *** like you that still hasnt recovered from the beatings Pac has inflicted on your heroes would say that the Chavez win was better than the MAB win.
So Pac aint one dimesnional then right? Again get off Floyds dick its not about him or their fight. Read the thread title *******.
I was giving PIPO their actual age at the time oscar fought them. atsch Is that so hard to understand:roll:
Whats up with these posters bringing up Floyd in this thread? Cant you guys asses something w/o mentioning him in your post? WTF!
well if your assesing someone its good to have examples as to what he doesnt do...what better example then the fighter who is considered one of the most complete and not to mention hsi next fight.
Now your just making stuff up... Cotto's win over Mosely was not controversial, quite decisive in fact. Can I have a link to where you said Pac over Cotto by KO?
Good exmple should be the past opponents because he fought them already and you can asses that. Hard to asses the styles of fighters when they have not fought yet. Do you get my point? :deal
see your point...your looking for names like Marquez right? i dont know it just seems if your asking why people say he is one dimensional then they should have the right to use examples of any fighter not just the fighters PAC beat down. I mean its his next fight, the most complete fighter today, and they are the TWO best in the game.....how do you not compare? you can assess styles without them having fought.
This is an expert's opinion, so no matter how stupid it appears to me, especially about MAB being shot in the first fight, i guess i have to respect it!
Their both completely different fighters. The question in my thread is " People say pac is one dimensional ". If he is, how the hell he beat all these great fighters and THAT meaning those opponents are one dimensional too beacuse they dont have a plan B or C.... Like I said, This is assesing Pac style not other fihgters.
Geez to say EM and MAB were past their use by dates... Wait wtf, Pacquiao is now the same age, and has had wars with EM, MAB, JMM, then he brawled a bunch of bigger guys. ****, it is Pacquiao that's lost a step or five going by this genius' logic. Christ, he's had some 50 odd fights, he's ****ing geriatric now.